|Participant in Afghan Civil War; War in Afghanistan|
A flag used by the Taliban from 1997 to 2001
Strict Sharia law
|Leaders||Mullah Mohammed Omar (founder and spiritual leader)|
|Afghanistan and northwest Pakistan|
|Strength||45,000 (2001 est.)
11,000 (2008 est.)
36,000 (2010 est.)
|Originated as||Students of Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam|
Islamic Emirate of Waziristan
Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan
East Turkestan Islamic Movement
|Opponents|| Islamic Republic of Afghanistan
International Security Assistance Force
Islamic Republic of Iran
|Qasim Nanotvi · Rashid Gangohi
Husain Madani · Mehmud Hasan
Shabbir Usmani · Ashraf Ali Thanwi
Anwar Kashmiri · Ilyas Kandhlawi
Ubaidullah Sindhi · Taqi Usmani
|Darul Uloom Deoband, India
Mazahirul Uloom Saharanpur, India
Hathazari Madrassah, Bangladesh
Darul-uloom Nadwatul Ulama, India
Darul Uloom Karachi, Pakistan
Jamia Uloom ul Islamia, Pakistan
Jamiah Darul Uloom Zahedan, Iran
Darul Uloom London, England
Darul Uloom New York, United States
Darul Uloom Canada, Canada
Madrasah In’aamiyyah, South Africa
Darul Uloom Zakariyya, South Africa
The Taliban (Pashto: طالبان ṭālibān “students”), alternative spelling Taleban, is an Islamic fundamentalist political movement in Afghanistan. It spread throughout Afghanistan and formed a government, ruling as the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan from September 1996 until December 2001, with Kandahar as the capital. However, it gained diplomatic recognition from only three states: Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. Mohammed Omar has been serving as the spiritual leader of the Taliban since 1994.
While in power, it enforced its strict interpretation of Sharia law, and leading Muslims have been highly critical of the Taliban’s interpretations of Islamic law. The Taliban were condemned internationally for their brutal treatment of women. The majority of the Taliban are made up of Afghan Pashtun tribesmen. The Taliban’s leaders were influenced by Deobandi fundamentalism, and many also strictly follow the social and cultural norm called Pashtunwali.
From 1995 to 2001, the Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence and military are widely alleged by the international community to have provided support to the Taliban. Their connections are possibly through Harkat-ul-Mujahideen, a terrorist group founded by Sami ul Haq. Pakistan is accused by many international officials of continuing to support the Taliban; Pakistan states that it dropped all support for the group after 9/11. Al Qaeda also supported the Taliban with regiments of imported fighters from Arab countries and Central Asia. Saudi Arabia provided financial support. The Taliban and their allies committed massacres against Afghan civilians, denied UN food supplies to 160,000 starving civilians and conducted a policy of scorched earth, burning vast areas of fertile land and destroying tens of thousands of homes during their rule from 1996 to 2001. Hundreds of thousands of people were forced to flee to United Front-controlled territory, Pakistan, and Iran.
After the attacks of September 11, 2001, the Taliban were overthrown by the American-led invasion of Afghanistan. Later it regrouped as an insurgency movement to fight the American-backed Karzai administration and the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF). The Taliban have been accused of using terrorism as a specific tactic to further their ideological and political goals. According to the United Nations, the Taliban and their allies were responsible for 75% of Afghan civilian casualties in 2010, 80% in 2011, and 80% in 2012. It is widely believed that the city of Quetta in Pakistan serves as Quetta Shura‘s headquarter.
- 1 Etymology
- 2 History
- 3 Human rights abuses
- 4 Ideology
- 5 Governance
- 6 Economy
- 7 International relations
- 8 See also
- 9 Bibliography
- 10 References
- 11 External links
The word Taliban is Pashto, طالبان ṭālibān, meaning “students”, the plural of ṭālib. This is a loanword from Arabic طالب ṭālib, plus the Persian plural ending -ān ان (the Arabic plural being طلاب ṭullāb, whereas طالبان ṭālibān is a dual form with the incongruous meaning, to Arabic speakers, of “two students”). Since becoming a loanword in English, Taliban, besides a plural noun referring to the group, has also been used as a singular noun referring to an individual. For example, John Walker Lindh has been referred to as “an American Taliban”, rather than “an American Talib”. In the English language newspapers of Pakistan, the word Talibans is often used when referring to more than one Taliban. The spelling Taliban has come to predominate over Taleban in English.
The Taliban movement traces its origin to the Pakistani-trained mujahideen in northern Pakistan, during the Soviet war in Afghanistan. When Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq became President of Pakistan he feared that the Soviets were planning to invade Balochistan, Pakistan so he sent Akhtar Abdur Rahman to Saudi Arabia to garner support for the Afghan resistance against Soviet occupation forces. In the meantime, the United States and Saudi Arabia joined the struggle against the Soviet Union by providing all the funds. Zia-ul-Haq has been labelled the “grandfather of global Islamic jihad”. He aligned himself with Pakistan’s Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam and later picked General Akhtar Abdur Rahman to lead the insurgency against the Soviet Union inside Afghanistan. About 90,000 Afghans, including Mohammad Omar, were trained by Pakistan’s ISI during the 1980s.
After the fall of Soviet-backed regime of Mohammad Najibullah in 1992, several Afghan political parties agreed on a peace and power-sharing agreement, the Peshawar Accord. The accord created the Islamic State of Afghanistan and appointed an interim government for a transitional period. According to Human Rights Watch:
The sovereignty of Afghanistan was vested formally in the Islamic State of Afghanistan, an entity created in April 1992, after the fall of the Soviet-backed Najibullah government. … With the exception of Gulbuddin Hekmatyar‘s Hezb-e Islami, all of the parties… were ostensibly unified under this government in April 1992. … Hekmatyar’s Hezb-e Islami, for its part, refused to recognize the government for most of the period discussed in this report and launched attacks against government forces and Kabul generally. … Shells and rockets fell everywhere.
Pakistan was keen to gear up for a breakthrough in Central Asia. … Islamabad could not possibly expect the new Islamic government leaders… to subordinate their own nationalist objectives in order to help Pakistan realize its regional ambitions. … Had it not been for the ISI’s logistic support and supply of a large number of rockets, Hekmatyar’s forces would not have been able to target and destroy half of Kabul.
In addition, Saudi Arabia and Iran – as competitors for regional hegemony – supported Afghan militias hostile towards each other. According to Human Rights Watch, Iran assisted the Shia Hazara Hezb-i Wahdat forces of Abdul Ali Mazari, as Iran attempted to maximize Wahdat’s military power and influence. Saudi Arabia supported the Wahhabite Abdul Rasul Sayyaf and his Ittihad-i Islami faction. Conflict between the two militias soon escalated. A publication by the George Washington University describes:
[O]utside forces saw instability in Afghanistan as an opportunity to press their own security and political agendas.
Due to the sudden initiation of the civil war, working government departments, police units or a system of justice and accountability for the newly created Islamic State of Afghanistan did not have time to form. Horrific crimes were committed by criminals and individuals inside different factions. Rare ceasefires, usually negotiated by representatives of the Islamic State’s newly appointed Defense Minister Ahmad Shah Massoud, President Sibghatullah Mojaddedi and later President Burhanuddin Rabbani (the interim government), or officials from the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), commonly collapsed within days. The countryside in northern Afghanistan, parts of which was under the control of Defense Minister Massoud remained calm and some reconstruction took place. The city of Herat under the rule of Islamic State allyIsmail Khan also witnessed relative calm.
Meanwhile southern Afghanistan was neither under the control of foreign-backed militias nor the government in Kabul, but was ruled by local leaders such as Gul Agha Sherzai and their militias. In 1991, the Taliban (a movement originating from Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-run religious schools for Afghan refugees in Pakistan) also developed in Afghanistan as a politico-religious force. Mullah Omar started his movement with fewer than 50 armed madrassah students in his hometown of Kandahar. The most often-repeated story and the Taliban’s own story of how Mullah Omar first mobilized his followers is that in the spring of 1994, neighbors in Singesar told him that the local governor had abducted two teenage girls, shaved their heads, and taken them to a camp where they were raped. 30 Taliban (with only 16 rifles) freed the girls, and hanged the governor from the barrel of a tank. Later that year, two militia commanders killed civilians while fighting for the right to sodomize a young boy. The Taliban freed him.
In the beginning the Taliban numbered in the hundreds, were badly equipped and low on munitions. Within months however 15,000 students arrived from the madrassas in Pakistan. The Taliban’s first major military activity was in 1994, when they marched northward from Maiwand and captured Kandahar City and the surrounding provinces, losing only a few dozen men. When they took control of Kandahar in 1994, they forced the surrender of dozens of local Pashtun leaders who had presided over a situation of complete lawlessness and atrocities. The Taliban also took over a border crossing at Spin Baldak and an ammunition dump from Gulbuddin Hekmatyar. In the course of 1994, the Taliban took control of 12 of 34 provinces not under central government control. Militias controlling the different areas often surrendered without a fight.Omar’s original commanders were “a mixture of former small-unit military commanders and madrassa teachers.”
At the same time most of the militia factions (Hekmatyar’s Hezb-i Islami, Dostum’s Junbish-i Milli and Hezb-i Wahdat) fighting in the battle for control of Kabul were defeated militarily by forces of the Islamic State’s Defense Minister Ahmad Shah Massoud. Bombardment of the capital came to a halt and the Islamic State initiated measures to restore law and order to the capital. Massoud furthermore tried to initiate a nationwide political process with the goal of national consolidation and democratic elections. Ahmad Shah Massoud, known as the “Lion of Panjshir”, had been named “the Afghan who won the Cold War” by the Wall Street Journal and had defeated the Soviet Red Army nine times in north-eastern Afghanistan. Hoping for the Taliban to be allies in bringing stability to Afghanistan, Massoud invited the Taliban to join the consolidation process and to contribute to stability. Unarmed, Massoud went to talk to a Taliban leaders in Maidan Shar to convince them to join the initiated political process, so that democratic elections could be held to decide on a future government for Afghanistan. The Taliban declined to join such a political process. When Massoud returned unharmed to Kabul, the Taliban leader who had received him as his guest was killed by other senior Taliban for failing to execute Massoud while the possibility had presented itself.
This is the first time in several months that Kabul civilians have become the targets of rocket attacks and shelling aimed at residential areas in the city.
The Taliban, however, suffered a devastating defeat against government forces of the Islamic State under the command of Ahmad Shah Massoud. The Taliban’s early victories in 1994 were followed by a series of defeats that resulted in heavy losses which led analysts to believe that the Taliban movement as such might have run its course. Pakistan, however, started to provide stronger military support to the Taliban. Many analysts like Amin Saikal describe the Taliban as developing into a proxy force for Pakistan’s regional interests. On September 26, 1996, as the Taliban with military support by Pakistan and financial support by Saudi Arabia prepared for another major offensive, Massoud ordered a full retreat from Kabul to continue anti-Taliban resistance in the Hindu Kush mountains instead of engaging in street battles in Kabul. The Taliban entered Kabul on September 27, 1996, and established the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.
Taliban Emirate against United Front
Role of the Pakistani military
The Taliban were largely founded by Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) in 1994. The ISI used the Taliban to establish a regime in Afghanistan which would be favorable to Pakistan, as they were trying to gain strategic depth. Since the creation of the Taliban, the ISI and the Pakistani military have given financial, logistical and military support.
According to Pakistani Afghanistan expert Ahmed Rashid, “between 1994 and 1999, an estimated 80,000 to 100,000 Pakistanis trained and fought in Afghanistan” on the side of the Taliban. Peter Tomsen stated that up until 9/11 Pakistani military and ISI officers along with thousands of regular Pakistani armed forces personnel had been involved in the fighting in Afghanistan.
In 2001 alone, according to several international sources, 28,000-30,000 Pakistani nationals, 14,000-15,000 Afghan Taliban and 2,000-3,000 Al Qaeda militants were fighting against anti-Taliban forces in Afghanistan as a roughly 45,000 strong military force. Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf – then as Chief of Army Staff – was responsible for sending thousands of Pakistanis to fight alongside the Taliban and Bin Laden against the forces of Ahmad Shah Massoud. Of the estimated 28,000 Pakistani nationals fighting in Afghanistan, 8,000 were militants recruited in madrassas filling regular Taliban ranks. A 1998 document by theU.S. State Department confirms that “20–40 percent of [regular] Taliban soldiers are Pakistani.” The document further states that the parents of those Pakistani nationals “know nothing regarding their child’s military involvement with the Taliban until their bodies are brought back to Pakistan.” According to the U.S. State Department report and reports by Human Rights Watch, the other Pakistani nationals fighting in Afghanistan were regular Pakistani soldiers especially from the Frontier Corps but also from the army providing direct combat support.
Human Rights Watch wrote in 2000:
Of all the foreign powers involved in efforts to sustain and manipulate the ongoing fighting [in Afghanistan], Pakistan is distinguished both by the sweep of its objectives and the scale of its efforts, which include soliciting funding for the Taliban, bankrolling Taliban operations, providing diplomatic support as the Taliban’s virtual emissaries abroad, arranging training for Taliban fighters, recruiting skilled and unskilled manpower to serve in Taliban armies, planning and directing offensives, providing and facilitating shipments of ammunition and fuel, and … directly providing combat support.
On August 1, 1997 the Taliban launched an attack on Sheberghan the main military base of Abdul Rashid Dostum. Dostum has said the reason the attack was successful was due to 1500 Pakistani commandos taking part and that the Pakistani air force also gave support.
In 1998, Iran accused Pakistan of sending its air force to bomb Mazar-i-Sharif in support of Taliban forces and directly accused Pakistani troops for “war crimes at Bamiyan“.  The same year Russia said, Pakistan was responsible for the “military expansion” of the Taliban in northern Afghanistan by sending large numbers of Pakistani troops some of whom had subsequently been taken as prisoners by the anti-Taliban United Front.
In 2000, the UN Security Council imposed an arms embargo against military support to the Taliban, with UN officials explicitly singling out Pakistan. The UN secretary-general implicitly criticized Pakistan for its military support and the Security Council stated it was “deeply distress[ed] over reports of involvement in the fighting, on the Taliban side, of thousands of non-Afghan nationals.” In July 2001, several countries including the United States, accused Pakistan of being “in violation of U.N. sanctions because of its military aid to the Taliban.” The Taliban also obtained financial resources from Pakistan. In 1997 alone, after the capture of Kabul by the Taliban, Pakistan gave $30 million in aid and a further $10 million for government wages.
In 2000, British Intelligence reported that the ISI was taking an active role in several Al Qaeda training camps. The ISI helped with the construction of training camps for both the Taliban and Al Qaeda. From 1996 to 2001 the Al Qaeda of Osama Bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri became a state within the Taliban state. Bin Laden sent Arab and Central Asian Al-Qaeda militants to join the fight against the United Front among them his Brigade 055.
After the 9/11 attacks, Pakistan claimed to have ended its support to the Taliban. But with the fall of Kabul to anti-Taliban forces in November 2001, ISI forces worked with and helped Taliban militias who were in full retreat. In November 2001, Taliban, Al-Qaeda combatants and ISI operatives were safely evacuated from Kunduz on Pakistan Army cargo aircraft to Pakistan Air Force bases in Chitral and Gilgit in Pakistan’s Northern Areas in what has been dubbed the “Airlift of Evil” Former Pakistani president Pervez Musharraf wrote in his memoirs that Richard Armitage, the former US deputy secretary of state, said Pakistan would be “bombed back to the stone-age” if it continued to support the Taliban, although Armitage has since denied using the “stone age” phrase.
The role of the Pakistani military has been described by international observers as well as by the anti-Taliban leader Ahmad Shah Massoud as a “creeping invasion”. Yet the “creeping invasion” proved unable to defeat the severely outnumbered anti-Taliban forces.
Anti-Taliban resistance under Massoud
Ahmad Shah Massoud and Abdul Rashid Dostum, former enemies, created the United Front (Northern Alliance) against the Taliban that were preparing offensives against the remaining areas under the control of Massoud and those under the control of Dostum. The United Front included beside the dominantly Tajik forces of Massoud and the Uzbek forces of Dostum, Hazara troops led by Haji Mohammad Mohaqiq and Pashtun forces under the leadership of commanders such as Abdul Haq and Haji Abdul Qadir. Notable politicians and diplomats of the United Front included Abdul Rahim Ghafoorzai, Abdullah Abdullah and Masood Khalili. From the Taliban conquest of Kabul in September 1996 until November 2001 the United Front controlled roughly 30% of Afghanistan’s population in provinces such as Badakhshan, Kapisa, Takhar and parts of Parwan, Kunar, Nuristan, Laghman, Samangan, Kunduz, Ghōr and Bamyan.
After longstanding battles especially for the northern city of Mazar-i-Sharif, Abdul Rashid Dostum and his Junbish forces were defeated by the Taliban and their allies in 1998. Dostum subsequently went into exile. Ahmad Shah Massoud remained the only major anti-Taliban leader inside Afghanistan who was able to defend vast parts of his territory against the Taliban.
In the areas under his control Massoud set up democratic institutions and signed the Women’s Rights Declaration. In the area of Massoud, women and girls did not have to wear the Afghan burqa. They were allowed to work and to go to school. In at least two known instances, Massoud personally intervened against cases of forced marriage.
It is our conviction and we believe that both men and women are created by the Almighty. Both have equal rights. Women can pursue an education, women can pursue a career, and women can play a role in society – just like men.—Ahmad Shah Massoud, 2001
Massoud is adamant that in Afghanistan women have suffered oppression for generations. He says that ‘the cultural environment of the country suffocates women. But the Taliban exacerbate this with oppression.’ His most ambitious project is to shatter this cultural prejudice and so give more space, freedom and equality to women – they would have the same rights as men.—Pepe Escobar, Massoud: From Warrior to Statesman
Afghan traditions would need a generation or more to overcome and could only be challenged by education, he said. Humayun Tandar, who took part as an Afghan diplomat in the 2001 International Conference on Afghanistan in Bonn, said that “strictures of language, ethnicity, region were [also] stifling for Massoud. That is why … he wanted to create a unity which could surpass the situation in which we found ourselves and still find ourselves to this day.” This applied also to strictures of religion. Jean-José Puig describes how Massoud often led prayers before a meal or at times asked his fellow Muslims to lead the prayer but also did not hesitate to ask a Christian friend Jean-José Puig or the Jewish Princeton University Professor Michael Barry: “Jean-José, we believe in the same God. Please, tell us the prayer before lunch or dinner in your own language.”
Human Rights Watch cites no human rights crimes for the forces under direct control of Massoud for the period from October 1996 until the assassination of Massoud in September 2001. 400,000 to one million Afghans fled from the Taliban to the area of Massoud.National Geographic concluded in its documentary “Inside the Taliban”:
The only thing standing in the way of future Taliban massacres is Ahmad Shah Massoud.—National Geographic, Inside the Taliban
The Taliban repeatedly offered Massoud a position of power to make him stop his resistance. Massoud declined. He explained in one interview:
The Taliban say: ‘Come and accept the post of prime minister and be with us’, and they would keep the highest office in the country, the presidentship. But at what cost?! The difference between us concerns mainly our way of thinking about the very principles of the society and the state. We can not accept their conditions of compromise, or else we would have to give up the principles of modern democracy. We are fundamentally against the system called ‘the Emirate of Afghanistan”.—Ahmad Shah Massoud, 2001
The United Front in its Proposals for Peace demanded the Taliban to join a political process leading towards nationwide democratic elections. In early 2001 Massoud employed a new strategy of local military pressure and global political appeals. Resentment was increasingly gathering against Taliban rule from the bottom of Afghan society including the Pashtun areas. Massoud publicized their cause “popular consensus, general elections and democracy” worldwide. At the same time he was very wary not to revive the failed Kabul government of the early 1990s. Already in 1999 he started the training of police forces which he trained specifically in order to keep order and protect the civilian population in case the United Front would be successful. Massoud stated:
The Taliban are not a force to be considered invincible. They are distanced from the people now. They are weaker than in the past. There is only the assistance given by Pakistan, Osama bin Laden and other extremist groups that keep the Taliban on their feet. With a halt to that assistance, it is extremely difficult to survive.—Ahmad Shah Massoud, 2001
From 1999 onwards a renewed process was set into motion by the Tajik Ahmad Shah Massoud and the Pashtun Abdul Haq to unite all the ethnicities of Afghanistan. While Massoud united the Tajiks, Hazara and Uzbeks as well as some Pashtun commanders under his United Front command, the famed Pashtun commander Abdul Haq received increasing numbers of defecting Pashtun Taliban as “Taliban popularity trended downward”. Both agreed to work together with the exiled Afghan king Zahir Shah. International officials who met with representatives of the new alliance, which Pulitzer Prize winner Steve Coll referred to as the “grand Pashtun-Tajik alliance”, said, “It’s crazy that you have this today … Pashtuns, Tajiks, Uzbeks, Hazara … They were all ready to buy in to the process … to work under the king’s banner for an ethnically balanced Afghanistan.” Senior diplomat and Afghanistan expert Peter Tomsen wrote: “The ‘Lion of Kabul’ [Abdul Haq] and the ‘Lion of Panjshir’ [Ahmad Shah Massoud] … Haq, Massoud, and Karzai, Afghanistan’s three leading moderates, could transcend the Pashtun—non-Pashtun, north-south divide.” The most senior Hazara and Uzbek leader were also part of the process. In late 2000, Massoud officially brought together this new alliance in a meeting in Northern Afghanistan among other things to discuss “a Loya Jirga, or a traditional council of elders, to settle political turmoil in Afghanistan”. That part of the Pashtun-Tajik-Hazara-Uzbek peace plan did eventually materialize. An account of the meeting by author and journalist Sebastian Junger says: “In 2000, when I was there … I happened to be there in a very interesting time. … Massoud brought together Afghan leaders from all ethnic groups. They flew from London, Paris, the USA, all parts of Afghanistan, Pakistan, India. He brought them all into the northern area where he was. He held a council of … prominent Afghans from all over the world, brought there to discuss the Afghan government after the Taliban. … we met all these men and interviewed them briefly. One was Hamid Karzai; I did not have any idea who he would end up being …”
In early 2001, Ahmad Shah Massoud with ethnic leader from all of Afghanistan addressed the European Parliament in Brussels asking the international community to provide humanitarian help to the people of Afghanistan. He stated that the Taliban and Al Qaeda had introduced “a very wrong perception of Islam” and that without the support of Pakistan and Bin Laden the Taliban would not be able to sustain their military campaign for up to a year. On this visit to Europe he also warned that his intelligence had gathered information about a large-scale attack on U.S. soil being imminent. The president of the European Parliament, Nicole Fontaine, called him the “pole of liberty in Afghanistan”.
On September 9, 2001, Massoud, then aged 48, was the target of a suicide attack by two Arabs posing as journalists at Khwaja Bahauddin, in the Takhar Province of Afghanistan. Massoud, who had survived countless assassination attempts over a period of 26 years, died in a helicopter taking him to a hospital. The first attempt on Massoud’s life had been carried out by Hekmatyar and two Pakistani ISI agents in 1975, when Massoud was only 22 years old. In early 2001, Al-Qaeda would-be assassins were captured by Massoud’s forces while trying to enter his territory. The funeral, though in a rather rural area, was attended by hundreds of thousands of mourning people.
The assassination of Massoud is believed to have a connection to the September 11, 2001 attacks on U.S. soil, which killed nearly 3000 people, and which appeared to be the terrorist attack that Massoud had warned against in his speech to the European Parliament several months earlier. John P. O’Neill was a counter-terrorism expert and the Assistant Director of the FBI until late 2001. He retired from the FBI and was offered the position of director of security at the World Trade Center (WTC). He took the job at the WTC two weeks before 9/11. On September 10, 2001, O’Neill told two of his friends, “We’re due. And we’re due for something big…. Some things have happened in Afghanistan. [referring to the assassination of Massoud] I don’t like the way things are lining up in Afghanistan…. I sense a shift, and I think things are going to happen … soon.” O’Neill died on September 11, 2001, when the South Tower collapsed.
After the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, Massoud’s United Front troops and United Front troops of Abdul Rashid Dostum (who returned from exile) ousted the Taliban from power in Kabul with American air support in Operation Enduring Freedom. From October to December 2001, the United Front gained control of much of the country and played a crucial role in establishing the post-Taliban interim government under Hamid Karzai.
American-led NATO invasion of Afghanistan, Taliban overthrow and insurgency
- Deliver to the U.S. all of the leaders of Al-Qaeda
- Release all foreign nationals that have been unjustly imprisoned
- Protect foreign journalists, diplomats, and aid workers
- Close immediately every terrorist training camp
- Hand over every terrorist and their supporters to appropriate authorities
- Give the United States full access to terrorist training camps for inspection
The U.S. petitioned the international community to back a military campaign to overthrow the Taliban. The U.N. issued two resolutions on terrorism after the September 11 attacks. The resolutions called on all states to “[increase] cooperation and full implementation of the relevant international conventions relating to terrorism” and specified consensus recommendations for all countries. The Security Council did not authorize military intervention in Afghanistan of any kind, and nowhere in the U.N resolutions did it say military operations in Afghanistan were justified or conformed to international law. Despite this, NATO approved a campaign against Afghanistan as self-defense against armed attack.
The Taliban ambassador to Pakistan, Abdul Salem Zaeef, responded to the ultimatum by demanding “convincing evidence” that Bin Laden was involved in the attacks, stating “our position is that if America has evidence and proof, they should produce it.” Additionally, the Taliban insisted that any trial of Bin Laden be held in an Afghan court. Zaeef also claimed that “4,000 Jews working in the Trade Center had prior knowledge of the suicide missions, and ‘were absent on that day.'” This response was generally dismissed as a delaying tactic, rather than a sincere attempt to cooperate with the ultimatum.
On September 22, the United Arab Emirates, and later Saudi Arabia, withdrew recognition of the Taliban as Afghanistan’s legal government, leaving neighbouring Pakistan as the only remaining country with diplomatic ties. On October 4, the Taliban agreed to turn bin Laden over to Pakistan for trial in an international tribunalthat operated according to Islamic Sharia law, but Pakistan blocked the offer as it was not possible to guarantee his safety. On October 7, the Taliban ambassador to Pakistan offered to detain bin Laden and try him under Islamic law if the U.S. made a formal request and presented the Taliban with evidence. A Bush administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity, rejected the Taliban offer, and stated that the U.S. would not negotiate their demands.
On October 7, less than one month after the September 11 attacks, the U.S., aided by the United Kingdom, Canada, and other countries including several from the NATO alliance, initiated military action, bombing Taliban and Al-Qaeda-related camps. The stated intent of military operations was to remove the Taliban from power, and prevent the use of Afghanistan as a terrorist base of operations.
The CIA’s elite Special Activities Division (SAD) units were the first U.S. forces to enter Afghanistan (noting that many different countries intelligence agencies were on the ground or operating within theatre before SAD, and that SAD are not technically military forces, but civilian paramilitaries). They joined with the Afghan United Front (Northern Alliance) to prepare for the subsequent arrival of U.S. Special Operations forces. The United Front (Northern Alliance) and SAD and Special Forces combined to overthrow the Taliban with minimal coalition casualties, and without the use of international conventional ground forces. The Washington Post stated in an editorial by John Lehman in 2006:
What made the Afghan campaign a landmark in the U.S. Military’s history is that it was prosecuted by Special Operations forces from all the services, along with Navy and Air Force tactical power, operations by the Afghan Northern Alliance and the CIA were equally important and fully integrated. No large Army or Marine force was employed.
On October 14, the Taliban offered to discuss handing over Osama bin Laden to a neutral country in return for a bombing halt, but only if the Taliban were given evidence of bin Laden’s involvement. The U.S. rejected this offer, and continued military operations. Mazar-i-Sharif fell to United Front troops of Ustad Atta Mohammad Noor and Abdul Rashid Dostum on November 9, triggering a cascade of provinces falling with minimal resistance.
In November 2001, before the capture of Kunduz by United Front troops under the command of Mohammad Daud Daud, thousands of top commanders and regular fighters of the Taliban and Al-Qaeda, Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence agents and military personnel, and other volunteers and sympathizers in the Kunduz airlift, dubbed the Airlift of Evil by US military forces around Kunduz and subsequently used as a term in media reports, were evacuated and airlifted out of Kunduz by Pakistan Army cargo aircraft to Pakistan Air Force air bases in Chitral and Gilgit in Pakistan’s Northern Areas.
On the night of November 12, the Taliban retreated south from Kabul. On November 15, they released eight Western aid workers after three months in captivity. By November 13, the Taliban had withdrawn from both Kabul and Jalalabad. Finally, in early December, the Taliban gave upKandahar, their last stronghold, dispersing without surrendering.
Before the summer 2006 offensive began, indications existed that soldiers in Afghanistan had lost influence and power to other groups, including potentially the Taliban. A notable sign was rioting in May after a street accident in the city of Kabul.
The continued support from tribal and other groups in Pakistan, the drug trade, and the small number of NATO forces, combined with the long history of resistance and isolation, indicated that Taliban forces and leaders were surviving. Suicide attacks and other terrorist methods not used in 2001 became more common. Observers suggested that poppy eradication, which destroys the livelihoods of rural Afghans, and civilian deaths caused by airstrikes encouraged the resurgence. These observers maintained that policy should focus on “hearts and minds” and on economic reconstruction, which could profit from switching from interdicting to diverting poppy production—to make medicine.
In September 2006, Pakistan recognized the Islamic Emirate of Waziristan, an association of Waziristani chieftains with close ties to the Taliban, as the de facto security force for Waziristan. This recognition was part of the agreement to end the Waziristan War, which had exacted a heavy toll on the Pakistan Army since early 2004. Some commentators viewed Islamabad‘s shift from war to diplomacy as implicit recognition of the growing power of the resurgent Taliban relative to American influence, with the U.S. distracted by the threat of looming crises in Iraq,Lebanon, and Iran.
Other commentators viewed Islamabad’s shift from war to diplomacy as an effort to appease growing discontent. Because of the Taliban’s leadership structure, Mullah Dadullah’s targeted killing in May 2007 did not have a significant effect, other than to damage incipient relations with Pakistan.
By 2009, a strong resistance was created, known as Operation Al Faath, the Arabic word for “victory” taken from the Koran, in the form of a guerrilla war. The Pashtun tribal group, with over 40 million members (including Afghans and Pakistanis) had a long history of resistance to occupation forces, so the Taliban may have comprised only a part of the insurgency. Most post-invasion Taliban fighters were new recruits, mostly drawn from local madrasas.
In December 2009, Asia Times Online reported that the Taliban had offered to give the US “legal guarantees” that it would not allow Afghanistan to be used for attacks on other countries, and that the US had given no response.
The United States has conducted targeted killings against Taliban leaders, mainly using Special Forces, and sometimes unmanned aerial vehicles. British forces also used similar tactics, mostly in Helmand Province, Afghanistan. During Operation Herrick, British special forces killed at least fifty high and local Taliban commanders in targeted killings in Helmand Province, which received both positive and negative coverage in the British media.
The Taliban also use targeted killings. In 2011 alone, they assassinated notable anti-Taliban leaders such as former Afghan President Burhanuddin Rabbani, the police chief in northern Afghanistan and the commander of the elite anti-Taliban 303 Pamir Corps, Mohammad Daud Daud and the police chief of Kunduz, Abdul Rahman Saidkhaili. All belonged to the Massoud faction of the United Front. According to Guantanamo Bay charge sheets, the United States Department of Defense believes the Taliban may maintain a 40-man undercover unit called “Jihad Kandahar”, which is used for undercover operations including assassination.
Human rights abuses
According to a 55-page report by the United Nations, the Taliban, while trying to consolidate control over northern and western Afghanistan, committed systematic massacres against civilians. UN officials stated that there had been “15 massacres” between 1996 and 2001. They also said, that “[t]hese have been highly systematic and they all lead back to the [Taliban] Ministry of Defense or to Mullah Omar himself.” “These are the same type of war crimes as were committed in Bosnia and should be prosecuted in international courts”, one UN official was quoted as saying. The documents also reveal the role of Arab and Pakistani support troops in these killings. Bin Laden’s so-called 055 Brigade was responsible for mass-killings of Afghan civilians. The report by the United Nations quotes “eyewitnesses in many villages describing Arab fighters carrying long knives used for slitting throats and skinning people”. The Taliban’s former ambassador to Pakistan, Mullah Abdul Salam Zaeef, in late 2011 stated that cruel behaviour under and by the Taliban had been “necessary”.
In 1998, the United Nations accused the Taliban of denying emergency food by the UN’s World Food Programme to 160,000 hungry and starving people “for political and military reasons”. The UN said the Taliban were starving people for their military agenda and using humanitarian assistance as a weapon of war.
On August 8, 1998 the Taliban launched an attack on Mazar-i Sharif. Of 1500 defenders only 100 survived the engagement. Once in control the Taliban began to kill people indiscriminately. At first shooting people in the street, they soon began to target Hazaras. Women were raped, and thousands of people were locked in containers and left to suffocate. This ethnic cleansing left an estimated 5,000 to 6,000 dead. At this time ten Iranian diplomats and a journalist were killed. Iran assumed the Taliban had murdered them, and mobilized its army, deploying men along the border with Afghanistan. By the middle of September there were 250,000 Iranian personnel stationed on the border. Pakistan mediated and the bodies were returned to Tehran towards the end of the month. The killings of the Diplomats had been carried out by Sipah-e-Sahaba a Pakistani Sunni group with close ties to the ISI. They burned orchards, crops and destroyed irrigation systems, and forced more than 100,000 people from their homes with hundreds of men, women and children still unaccounted for.
In a major effort to retake the Shomali plains from the United Front, the Taliban indiscriminately killed civilians, while uprooting and expelling the population. Among others, Kamal Hossein, a special reporter for the UN, reported on these and other war crimes. The city of Istalif i. e. was home to more than 45,000 people. In Istalif the Taliban gave 24 hours notice to the population to leave, then completely razed the town leaving the people destitute.
In 1999 the town of Bamian was taken, hundreds of men, women and children were executed. Houses were razed and some were used for forced labor. There was a further massacre at the town of Yakaolang in January 2001. An estimated 300 people were murdered, along with two delegations of Hazara elders who had tried to intercede.
By 1999, the Taliban had forced hundreds of thousands of people from the Shomali Plains and other regions conducting a policy of scorched earth burning homes, farm land and gardens.
Several Taliban and Al-Qaeda commanders ran a network of human trafficking, abducting women and selling them into sex slavery in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Time Magazine writes: “The Taliban often argued that the brutal restrictions they placed on women were actually a way of revering and protecting the opposite sex. The behavior of the Taliban during the six years they expanded their rule in Afghanistan made a mockery of that claim.”
The targets for human trafficking were especially women from the Tajik, Uzbek, Hazara and other ethnic groups in Afghanistan. Some women preferred to commit suicide over slavery, killing themselves. During one Taliban and Al-Qaeda offensive in 1999 in the Shomali Plains alone, more than 600 women were kidnapped.Taliban as well as Arab and Pakistani Al-Qaeda militants forced them into trucks and buses. Time Magazine writes: “The trail of the missing Shomali women leads to Jalalabad, not far from the Pakistan border. There, according to eyewitnesses, the women were penned up inside Sar Shahi camp in the desert. The more desirable among them were selected and taken away. Some were trucked to Peshawar with the apparent complicity of Pakistani border guards. Others were taken to Khost, where bin Laden had several training camps.” Officials from relief agencies say, the trail of many of the vanished women leads to Pakistan where they were sold to brothels or into private households to be kept as slaves.
Some local Taliban commanders were opposed to the human trafficking ordered and conducted by their leaders. One Taliban commander, Nuruludah, is quoted as saying that he and his men freed some women which were being abducted by Pakistani members of Al-Qaeda. A few local Taliban in Jalalabad also freed women that were being held by other Taliban and members of Al-Qaeda in a camp.
Oppression of women
—Physicians for Human Rights, 1998
The Taliban were condemned internationally for their brutal repression of women. In 2001 Laura Bush in a radio address condemned the Taliban’s brutality to women. In areas they controlled the Taliban issued edicts which forbade women from being educated, girls were forced to leave schools and colleges. Those who wished to leave their home to go shopping had to be accompanied by a male relative, and were required to wear the burqa, a traditional dress covering the entire body except for a small screen to see out of. Those who appeared to disobey were publicly beaten. Sohaila, a young woman who was convicted of walking with a man who was not a relative, was charged with adultery. She was publicly flogged in Ghazi Stadium and received 100 lashes. The religious police routinely carried out inhumane abuse on women. Employment for women was restricted to the medical sector, because male medical personnel were not allowed to treat women and girls. One result of the banning of employment of women by the Taliban was the closing down in places like Kabul of primary schools not only for girls but for boys, because almost all the teachers there were women. Taliban restrictions became more severe after they took control of the capital. In February 1998, religious police forced all women off the streets of Kabul, and issued new regulations ordering people to blacken their windows, so that women would not be visible from the outside.
Terrorism against civilians
According to Human Rights Watch, the Taliban’s bombings and other attacks which have led to civilian casualties “sharply escalated in 2006” when “at least 669 Afghan civilians were killed in at least 350 armed attacks, most of which appear to have been intentionally launched at non-combatants.” By 2008, the Taliban had increased its use of suicide bombers and targeted unarmed civilian aid workers, such as Gayle Williams.
The United Nations reported that the number of civilians killed by both the Taliban and pro-government forces in the war rose nearly 50% between 2007 and 2009. The high number of civilians killed by the Taliban is blamed in part on their increasing use of improvised explosive devices (IEDs), “for instance, 16 IEDs have been planted in girls’ schools” by the Taliban.
In 2009, Colonel Richard Kemp, formerly Commander of British forces in Afghanistan and the intelligence coordinator for the British government, drew parallels between the tactics and strategy of Hamas in Gaza to those of the Taliban. Kemp wrote:
Like Hamas in Gaza, the Taliban in southern Afghanistan are masters at shielding themselves behind the civilian population and then melting in among them for protection. Women and children are trained and equipped to fight, collect intelligence, and ferry arms and ammunition between battles. Female suicide bombers are increasingly common. The use of women to shield gunmen as they engage NATO forces is now so normal it is deemed barely worthy of comment. Schools and houses are routinely booby-trapped. Snipers shelter in houses deliberately filled with women and children.—Richard Kemp, Commander of British forces in Afghanistan
The Taliban has often targeted health officials that work to immunise children against polio due to fears of the vaccine, including the fear that it is used to gather intelligence about their organisation. Polio vaccines were banned in the North Waziristan region of Pakistan in June 2012 and in December 2012, Taliban assassins killed four female UN polio-workers in Pakistan because they were thought to be spies. The Afghan government was forced to suspend vaccination efforts to eliminate polio from the Nuristan province in March 2013 because of a large Taliban influence in the province. Taliban leaders changed their stance on polio vaccination in early May 2013, saying the vaccine is the only way to prevent polio and that they would work with immunisation volunteers so long as polio workers are “unbiased” and “harmonised with the regional conditions, Islamic values and local cultural traditions.”
The Taliban initially enjoyed goodwill from Afghans weary of the warlords’ corruption, brutality, and incessant fighting. However, this popularity was not universal, particularly among non-Pashtuns.
The Taliban’s extremely strict and anti-modern ideology has been described as an “innovative form of sharia combining Pashtun tribal codes,” or Pashtunwali, with radical Deobandi interpretations of Islam favored by JUI and its splinter groups. Also contributing to the mix was the jihadism and pan-Islamism of Osama bin Laden. Their ideology was a departure from the Islamism of the anti-Soviet mujahideen rulers they replaced who tended to be mystical Sufis, traditionalists, or radical Islamicists inspired by the Muslim Brotherhood (Ikhwan).
Under the Taliban regime, Sharia law was interpreted to forbid a wide variety of previously lawful activities in Afghanistan. One Taliban list of prohibitions included: pork, pig, pig oil, anything made from human hair, satellite dishes, cinematography, musical equipment, pool tables, chess, masks, alcohol, tapes, computers, VCRs, television, anything that propagates sex and is full of music, wine, lobster, nail polish, firecrackers, statues, sewing catalogs, pictures, Christmas cards. They also got rid of employment, education, sports for all women, dancing, clapping during sports events, kite flying, and characterizations of living things, including drawings, paintings, photographs, stuffed animals, and dolls. Men had to have a fist size beard at the bottom of their chin. Conversely, they had to wear their head hair short. They had to wear a head covering.
Many of these activities were hitherto lawful in Afghanistan. Critics complained that most Afghans followed a different, less strict, and less intrusive interpretation of Islam. The Taliban did not eschew all traditional popular practices. For example, they did not destroy the graves of Sufi pirs (holy men), and emphasized dreams as a means of revelation.
Taliban have been described as both anti-nationalist and Pushtun nationalist. According to journalist Ahmed Rashid, at least in the first years of their rule, they adopted Deobandi and Islamist anti-nationalist beliefs, and opposed “tribal and feudal structures,” eliminating traditional tribal or feudal leaders from leadership roles.According to Ali A. Jalali and Lester Grau, the Taliban “received extensive support from Pashtuns across the country who thought that the movement might restore their national dominance. Even Pashtun intellectuals in the West, who differed with the Taliban on many issues, expressed support for the movement on purely ethnic grounds.”
Like Wahhabi and other Deobandis, the Taliban do not consider Shiʻi to be Muslims. The Shia in Afghanistan consist mostly of the Hazara ethnic group which totaled almost 10% of Afghanistan’s population.
The Taliban mainly strictly enforced its ideologies in major cities like Herat, Kabul, and Kandahar. In rural areas the Taliban had little direct control, and the Taliban had promoted village jirgas, so it did not as stringently enforce its ideology in rural areas.
In 1999, Mullah Omar issued a decree protecting the Buddha statues at Bamyan, two 6th century monumental statues of standing buddhas carved into the side of a cliff in the Bamyan valley in the Hazarajat region of central Afghanistan. He did this because Afghanistan had no Buddhists, so idolatry would not be a problem. But in March 2001 the statues were destroyed by the Taliban of Mullah Omar following a decree stating: “all the statues around Afghanistan must be destroyed.”
Yahya Massoud, brother of the anti-Taliban and resistance leader Ahmad Shah Massoud, recalls the following incident after the destruction of the Buddha statues at Bamyan:
It was the spring of 2001. I was in Afghanistan’s Panjshir Valley, together with my brother Ahmad Shah Massoud, the leader of the Afghan resistance against the Taliban, and Bismillah Khan, who currently serves as Afghanistan’s interior minister. One of our commanders, Commandant Momin, wanted us to see 30 Taliban fighters who had been taken hostage after a gun battle. My brother agreed to meet them.
I remember that his first question concerned the centuries-old Buddha statues that were dynamited by the Taliban in March of that year, shortly before our encounter. Two Taliban combatants from Kandahar confidently responded that worshiping anything outside of Islam was unacceptable and that therefore these statues had to be destroyed. My brother looked at them and said, this time in Pashto, ‘There are still many sun- worshippers in this country. Will you also try to get rid of the sun and drop darkness over the Earth?'”‘
Explanation of ideology
The author Ahmed Rashid suggests that the devastation and hardship of the Soviet invasion and the following period influenced Taliban ideology. It is said the Taliban did not include scholars learned in Islamic law and history. The refugee students, brought up in a totally male society, not only had no education in mathematics, science, history or geography, but also had no traditional skills of farming, herding, or handicraft-making, nor even knowledge of their tribal and clan lineages. In such an environment, war meant employment, peace meant unemployment. Dominating women simply affirmed manhood. For their leadership, rigid fundamentalism was a matter not only of principle, but also of political survival. Taliban leaders “repeatedly told” Rashid that “if they gave women greater freedom or a chance to go to school, they would lose the support of their rank and file.”
The Taliban were criticized for their strictness toward those who disobeyed their imposed rules. Many Muslims complained that most Taliban rules had no basis in the Qur’an or sharia. Mullah Omar‘s title as Amir al-Mu’minin was criticized on the grounds that he lacked scholarly learning, tribal pedigree, or connections to the Prophet’s family. Sanction for the title traditionally required the support of all of the country’s ulema, whereas only some 1,200 Pashtun Taliban-supporting Mullahs had declared Omar the Amir. “No Afghan had adopted the title since 1834, when KingDost Mohammed Khan assumed the title before he declared jihad against the Sikh kingdom in Peshawar. But Dost Mohammed was fighting foreigners, while Omar had declared jihad against other Afghans.”
The Taliban, de jure, controlled 85% of Afghanistan. De facto the areas under its direct control were mainly Afghanistan’s major cities and highways. Tribal khans and warlords had de facto direct control over various small towns, villages, and rural areas.
The Sharia does not allow politics or political parties. That is why we give no salaries to officials or soldiers, just food, clothes, shoes, and weapons. We want to live a life like the Prophet lived 1400 years ago, and jihad is our right. We want to recreate the time of the Prophet, and we are only carrying out what the Afghan people have wanted for the past 14 years.
They modeled their decision-making process on the Pashtun tribal council (jirga), together with what they believed to be the early Islamic model. Discussion was followed by a building of a consensus by the “believers”. Before capturing Kabul, there was talk of stepping aside once a government of “good Muslims” took power, and law and order were restored.
As the Taliban’s power grew, decisions were made by Mullah Omar without consulting the jirga and without consulting other parts of the country. He visited the capital, Kabul, only twice while in power. Instead of an election, their leader’s legitimacy came from an oath of allegiance (“Bay’ah“), in imitation of the Prophet and the first four Caliphs. On April 4, 1996, Mullah Omar had “the Cloak of the Prophet Mohammed” taken from its shrine for the first time in 60 years. Wrapping himself in the relic, he appeared on the roof of a building in the center of Kandahar while hundreds of Pashtunmullahs below shouted “Amir al-Mu’minin!” (Commander of the Faithful), in a pledge of support. Taliban spokesman Mullah Wakil explained:
Decisions are based on the advice of the Amir-ul Momineen. For us consultation is not necessary. We believe that this is in line with the Sharia. We abide by the Amir’s view even if he alone takes this view. There will not be a head of state. Instead there will be an Amir al-Mu’minin. Mullah Omar will be the highest authority, and the government will not be able to implement any decision to which he does not agree. General elections are incompatible with Sharia and therefore we reject them.
The Taliban were very reluctant to share power, and since their ranks were overwhelmingly Pashtun they ruled as overlords over the 60% of Afghans from other ethnic groups. In local government, such as Kabul city council or Herat, Taliban loyalists, not locals, dominated, even when thePashto-speaking Taliban could not communicate with the roughly half of the population who spoke Dari or other non-Pashtun tongues. Critics complained that this “lack of local representation in urban administration made the Taliban appear as an occupying force.”
Consistent with the governance of early Muslims was the absence of state institutions or “a methodology for command and control” that is standard today even among non-Westernized states. The Taliban did not issue press releases, policy statements, or hold regular press conferences. The outside world and most Afghans did not even know what their leaders looked like, since photography was banned. The “regular army” resembled a lashkar or traditional tribal militia force with only 25,000 men (of whom 11,000 were non-Afghans).
Cabinet ministers and deputies were mullahs with a “madrasah education.” Several of them, such as the Minister of Health and Governor of the State bank, were primarily military commanders who left their administrative posts to fight when needed. Military reverses that trapped them behind lines or led to their deaths increased the chaos in the national administration. At the national level, “all senior Tajik, Uzbek and Hazara bureaucrats” were replaced “with Pashtuns, whether qualified or not.” Consequently, the ministries “by and large ceased to function.”
The Ministry of Finance had neither a budget nor “qualified economist or banker.” Mullah Omar collected and dispersed cash without bookkeeping.
According to the testimony of Guantanamo captives before their Combatant Status Review Tribunals, the Taliban, in addition to conscripting men to serve as soldiers, also conscripted men to staff its civil service.
The Kabul money markets responded positively during the first weeks of the Taliban occupation. But the Afghani soon fell in value. They imposed a 50% tax on any company operating in the country, and those who failed to pay were attacked. They also imposed a 6% import tax on anything brought into the country,and by 1998 had control of the major airports and border crossings which allowed them to establish a monopoly on all trade. By 2001 the per capita income of the 25 million population was under $200, and the country was close to total economic collapse. As of 2007 the economy had begun to recover, with estimated foreign reserves of three billion dollars and a 13% increase in economic growth.
Under the Transit treaty between Afghanistan and Pakistan a massive network for smuggling developed. It had an estimated turnover of 2.5 billion dollars with the Taliban receiving between $100 and $130 million per year. These operations along with the trade from the Golden Crescentfinanced the war in Afghanistan and also had the side effect of destroying start up industries in Pakistan. Ahmed Rashid also explained that the Afghan Transit Trade agreed on by Pakistan was “the largest official source of revenue for the Taliban.”
Between 1996 and 1999 Mullah Omar reversed his opinions on the drug trade, apparently as it only harmed kafirs. The Taliban controlled 96% of Afghanistan’s poppy fields and made opium its largest source of taxation. Taxes on opium exports became one of the mainstays of Taliban income and their war economy. According to Rashid, “drug money funded the weapons, ammunition and fuel for the war.” In the New York Times, the Finance Minister of the United Front, Wahidullah Sabawoon, declared the Taliban had no annual budget but that they “appeared to spend US$300 million a year, nearly all of it on war.” He added that the Taliban had come to increasingly rely on three sources of money: “poppy, the Pakistanis and bin Laden.”
In an economic sense it seems however he had little choice, as the war of attrition continued with the Northern Alliance the income from continued opium production was all that prevented the country from starvation. By 2000 Afghanistan accounted for an estimated 75% of the world’s supply and in 2000 grew an estimated 3276 tonnes of opium from poppy cultivation on 82,171 hectares. At this juncture Omar passed a decree banning the cultivation of opium, and production dropped to an estimated 74 metric tonnes from poppy cultivation on 1,685 hectares.Many observers say the ban – which came in a bid for international recognition at the United Nations – was only issued in order to raise opium prices and increase profit from the sale of large existing stockpiles. The year 1999 had yielded a record crop and had been followed by a lower but still large 2000 harvest. The trafficking of accumulated stocks by the Taliban continued in 2000 and 2001. In 2002, the UN mentioned the “existence of significant stocks of opiated accumulated during previous years of bumper harvests.” In September 2001 – before the 11 September attacks against the United States – the Taliban allegedly authorized Afghan peasants to sow opium again.
There was also an environmental toll to the country, heavy deforestation from the illegal trade in timber with hundreds of acres of pine and cedar forests in Kunar Province and Paktya being cleared. Throughout the country millions of acres were denuded to supply timber to the Pakistani markets, with no attempt made at reforestation, which has led to significant environmental damage. By 2001, when the Afghan Interim Administration took power the country’s infrastructure was in ruins, Telecommunications had failed, the road network was destroyed and Ministry of Finance buildings were in such a state of disrepair some were on the verge of collapse. On July 6, 1999 former president Bill Clinton signed into effect executive order 13129. This order implemented a complete ban on any trade between America and the Taliban regime and on August 10 they froze £5000,000 in Ariana assets. On December 19, 2000 UN resolution 1333 was passed. It called for all assets to be frozen and for all states to close any offices belonging to the Taliban. This included the offices of Ariana Afghan Airlines. In 1999 the UN had passed resolution 1267 which had banned all international flights by Ariana apart from preapproved humanitarian missions.
During its time in power, the Taliban regime, or “Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan”, gained diplomatic recognition from only three states: the United Arab Emirates, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia, all of which provided substantial aid. The other nations including the United Nations recognized the government of the Islamic State of Afghanistan (parts of whom were part of the United Front (Northern Alliance) as the legitimate government of Afghanistan.
The “vast majority” of the Taliban’s rank and file and most of the leadership, though not Mullah Omar, were Koranic students who had studied at madrasas set up for Afghan refugees, usually by JUI. Maulana Fazal-ur-Rehman, JUI’s leader, was a political ally of Benazir Bhutto. After Bhutto became prime minister, Rehman “had access to the government, the army and the ISI,” whom he influenced to help the Taliban.
Human Rights Watch writes, “Pakistani aircraft assisted with troop rotations of Taliban forces during combat operations in late 2000 and … senior members of Pakistan’s intelligence agency and army were involved in planning military operations.” Pakistan provided military equipment, recruiting assistance, training, and tactical advice. Officially Pakistan denied supporting the Taliban militarily.
Author Ahmed Rashid claims that the Taliban had “unprecedented access” among Pakistan’s lobbies and interest groups. He also writes that they at times were able to “play off one lobby against another and extend their influence in Pakistan even further”. By 1998–99, Taliban-style groups in Pakistan’s Pashtun belt, and to an extent in Pakistan-administered Kashmir, “were banning TV and videos … and forcing people, particularly women, to adapt to the Taliban dress code and way of life.”
After the attacks of September 11, 2001, and the U.S. operation in Afghanistan the Afghan Taliban leadership is claimed to have fled to Pakistan where they regrouped and created several shuras to coordinate their insurgency in Afghanistan. On February 8, 2009, U.S. commander of operations in Afghanistan General Stanley McChrystal and other officials said that the Taliban leadership was in Quetta, Pakistan, though the Pakistani government, an official U.S. ally, denied this.
A range of officials inside and outside Pakistan have stepped up suggestions of links between the ISI and terrorist groups in recent years. In fall 2006, a leaked report by a British Defense Ministry think tank charged, “Indirectly Pakistan (through the ISI) has been supporting terrorism and extremism–whether in London on 7/7 [the July 2005 attacks on London’s transit system], or in Afghanistan, or Iraq.” In June 2008, Afghan officials accused Pakistan’s intelligence service of plotting a failed assassination attempt on President Hamid Karzai; shortly thereafter, they implied the ISI’s involvement in a July 2008 Taliban attack on the Indian embassy. Indian officials also blamed the ISI for the bombing of the Indian embassy. Numerous U.S. officials have also accused the ISI of supporting terrorist groups including the Afghan Taliban. U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said “to a certain extent, they play both sides.” Gates and others suggest the ISI maintains links with groups like the Afghan Taliban as a “strategic hedge” to help Islamabad gain influence in Kabul once U.S. troops exit the region.  U.S. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen in 2011 called the Haqqani network (the Afghan Taliban’s most destructive element) a “veritable arm of Pakistan’s ISI”. He further stated, “Extremist organizations serving as proxies of the government of Pakistan are attacking Afghan troops and civilians as well as US soldiers.”
From 2010, a report by a leading British institution also claimed that Pakistan’s intelligence service still today has a strong link with the Taliban in Afghanistan. Published by the London School of Economics, the report said that Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence agency (ISI) has an “official policy” of support for the Taliban. It said the ISI provides funding and training for the Taliban, and that the agency has representatives on the so-called Quetta Shura, the Taliban’s leadership council, which is believed to meet in Pakistan. The report, based on interviews with Taliban commanders in Afghanistan, was written by Matt Waldman, a fellow at Harvard University.
“Pakistan appears to be playing a double-game of astonishing magnitude,” the report said. The report also linked high-level members of the Pakistani government with the Taliban. It said Asif Ali Zardari, the Pakistani president, met with senior Taliban prisoners in 2010 and promised to release them. Zardari reportedly told the detainees they were only arrested because of American pressure. “The Pakistan government’s apparent duplicity – and awareness of it among the American public and political establishment – could have enormous geopolitical implications,” Waldman said. “Without a change in Pakistani behaviour it will be difficult if not impossible for international forces and the Afghan government to make progress against the insurgency.” Afghan officials have long been suspicious of the ISI’s role. Amrullah Saleh, the former director of Afghanistan’s intelligence service, told Reuters that the ISI was “part of a landscape of destruction in this country”.
Pakistan on other hand has strongly denied all links with Taliban or any terrorist groups with the argument that Pakistan is the biggest victim of the “War on terror” with a loss of 35,000 lives including policemen, soldiers and mostly civilians. Pakistan’s military officials called such allegations highly biased and factually inaccurate. The military spokes person said that not a single bullet or financial support had been given to Taliban. Pakistan’s foreign minister further clarified that if Pakistan had recruited some people for intelligence purposes, it did not mean that Pakistan supported them. United States along with the accusations of supporting Taliban has also called Pakistan as an indispensable ally. Pakistan has also reportedly warned United States that it may lose a key ally due to such accusations.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (Pakistani Taliban)
Before the creation of the Tehrik-i-Taliban(Pakistan), some of their leaders and fighters were part of the 8,000 Pakistani militants fighting in the War in Afghanistan (1996-2001) and the War in Afghanistan (2001-present) against the United Islamic Front and NATO forces. Most of them hail from the Pakistani side of the Af-Pak border regions. After the fall of the Afghan Taliban in late 2001 most Pakistani militants including members of today’s TTP fled home to Pakistan.
After the creation of the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan in 2007, headed by Baitullah Mehsud, its members have officially defined goals to establish their rule over Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas. They engage the Pakistani army in heavy combat operations. Some intelligence analysts believe that the TTP’s attacks on the Pakistani government, police and army strained the TTP’s relations with the Afghan Taliban.
The Afghan Taliban and the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan differ greatly in their history, leadership and goals although they share a common interpretation of Islam and are both predominantly Pashtun. The Afghan Taliban have no affiliation with the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan and routinely deny any connection to the TTP. The New York Times quoted a spokesman for the Afghan Taliban stating that:
We don’t like to be involved with them, as we have rejected all affiliation with Pakistani Taliban fighters … We have sympathy for them as Muslims, but beside that, there is nothing else between us.
It is alleged that Afghan Taliban relied on support by the Pakistani army in the past and are still supported by them today in their campaign to control Afghanistan. Regular Pakistani army troops fought alongside the Afghan Taliban in the War in Afghanistan (1996–2001). Major leaders of the Afghan Taliban including Mullah Omar, Jalaluddin Haqqani and Siraj Haqqani are believed to enjoy safe haven in Pakistan. In 2006 Jalaluddin Haqqani was allegedly called a ‘Pakistani asset’ by a senior official of Inter-Services Intelligence. Pakistan denies any links with Haqqani or other terrorist groups. Haqqani himself has denied any links with Pakistan as well.
Afghan Taliban leader Mullah Omar asked the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan in late 2008 and early 2009 to stop attacks inside Pakistan, to change their focus as an organization and to fight the Afghan National Army and ISAF forces in Afghanistan instead. In late December 2008 and early January 2009 he sent a delegation, led by former Guantanamo Bay detainee Mullah Abdullah Zakir, to persuade leading members of the TTP to put aside differences with Pakistan.
Some regional experts state the common name “Taliban” may be more misleading than illuminating. Gilles Dorronsoro, a scholar of South Asia currently at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington says:
The fact that they have the same name causes all kinds of confusion.
As the Pakistani Army began offensives against the Pakistani Taliban, many unfamiliar with the region thought incorrectly that the assault was against the Afghan Taliban of Mullah Omar which was not the case.
Malakand Taliban is militant outfit led by Sufi Muhammad and his son in law Molvi Fazalullah. Sufi Muhammad is in Pakistani government custody, however, Molvi Fazalullah is believed to be in Afghanistan. In the last week of May 2011, eight security personnel and civilians fell victim to four hundred armed Taliban who attacked Shaltalo check post in Dir, a frontier District of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, located few kilometers away from Afghan border. Although, they have been linked with Waziristan-based Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), however, the connection between these two groups is of symbolic nature.
In 1996, bin Laden moved to Afghanistan from Sudan. He came without invitation, and sometimes irritated Mullah Omar with his declaration of war and fatwas against citizens of third-party countries, but relations between the two groups improved over time, to the point that Mullah Omar rebuffed his group’s patron Saudi Arabia, insulting Saudi minister Prince Turki while reneging on an earlier promise to turn bin Laden over to the Saudis.
Bin Laden was able to forge an alliance between the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. The Al Qaeda-trained 055 Brigade integrated with the Taliban army between 1997 and 2001. Several hundred Arab Afghan fighters sent by bin Laden assisted the Taliban in the Mazar-e-Sharif slaughter. The so-called Brigade 055 was also responsible for massacres against civilians in other parts of Afghanistan. From 1996 to 2001 the organization of Osama Bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri had become a virtual state within the Taliban state.
Taliban-Al-Qaeda connections were also strengthened by the reported marriage of one of bin Laden’s sons to Omar’s daughter. While in Afghanistan, bin Laden may have helped finance the Taliban.
After the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings in Africa, bin Laden and several Al-Qaeda members were indicted in U.S. criminal court. The Taliban rejected extradition requests by the U.S., variously claiming that bin Laden had “gone missing”, or that Washington “cannot provide any evidence or any proof” that bin Laden is involved in terrorist activities and that “without any evidence, bin Laden is a man without sin… he is a free man.”
Evidence against bin Laden included courtroom testimony and satellite phone records. Bin Laden in turn, praised the Taliban as the “only Islamic government” in existence, and lauded Mullah Omar for his destruction of idols such as the Buddhas of Bamyan.
At the end of 2008, the Taliban was in talks to sever all ties with Al-Qaeda.
In 2011, Alex Strick van Linschoten and Felix Kuehn at New York University’s Center on International Cooperation claimed that the two groups did not get along at times before the September 11 attacks, and they have continued to fight since on account of their differences.
Iran has historically been an enemy of the Taliban. In early August 1998, after attacking the city of Mazar, Taliban forces killed several thousand civilians and 10 Iranian diplomats and intelligence officers in the Iranian consulate. Alleged radio intercepts indicate Mullah Omar personally approved the killings. In the following crisis between Iran and the Taliban, the Iranian government amassed up to 200,000 regular troops on the Afghan-Iranian border. War was eventually averted.
Many U.S. senior military officials such as Robert Gates, Stanley McChrystal, David Petraeus and others believe that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps nowadays is involved in helping the Taliban to a certain extent. Reports in which NATO states accused Iran of supplying and training some Taliban insurgents started coming forward since 2004/2005.
“We did interdict a shipment, without question the Revolutionary Guard‘s core Quds Force, through a known Taliban facilitator. Three of the individuals were killed… 48 122 millimetre rockets were intercepted with their various components… Iranians certainly view as making life more difficult for us if Afghanistan is unstable. We don’t have that kind of relationship with the Iranians. That’s why I am particularly troubled by the interception of weapons coming from Iran. But we know that it’s more than weapons; it’s money; it’s also according to some reports, training at Iranian camps as well.”
The United States supported the Taliban through its allies in Pakistan and Saudi Arabia between 1994 and 1996 because Washington viewed the Taliban as anti-Iranian, anti-Shia and pro-Western. Washington furthermore hoped that the Taliban would support development planned by the U.S.-based oil company Unocal.For example, it made no comment when the Taliban captured Herat in 1995, and expelled thousands of girls from schools; the Taliban began killing unarmed civilians, targeting ethnic groups (primarily Hazaras), and restricting the rights of women. In late 1997, American Secretary of State Madeleine Albright began to distance the U.S. from the Taliban. The next year, the American-based oil company Unocal withdrew from negotiations on pipeline construction from Central Asia.
One day before the capture of Mazar, bin Laden affiliates bombed two U.S. embassies in Africa, killing 224 and wounding 4,500, mostly Africans. The U.S. responded by launching cruise missiles on suspected terrorist camps in Afghanistan, killing over 20 though failing to kill bin Laden or even many Al-Qaeda. Mullah Omar condemned the missile attack and American President Bill Clinton. Saudi Arabia expelled the Taliban envoy in protest over the refusal to turn over bin Laden, and after Mullah Omar allegedly insulted the Saudi royal family. In mid-October the U.N. Security Council voted unanimously to ban commercial aircraft flights to and from Afghanistan, and freeze its bank accounts worldwide.
On November 26, 2009, in an interview with CNN‘s Christiane Amanpour, President Hamid Karzai said there is an “urgent need” for negotiations with the Taliban, and made it clear that the Obama administration had opposed such talks. There was no formal American response.
In December 2009, Asian Times Online reported that the Taliban had offered to give the US “legal guarantees” that they would not allow Afghanistan to be used for attacks on other countries, and that there had been no formal American response.
On December 6, U.S officials indicated that they have not ruled out talks with the Taliban. Several days later it was reported that Gates saw potential for reconciliation with the Taliban, but not with Al-Qaeda. Furthermore, he said that reconciliation would politically end the insurgency and the war. But he said reconciliation must be on the Afghan government’s terms, and that the Taliban must be subject to the sovereignty of the government.
In 2010, General McChrystal said his troop surge could lead to a negotiated peace with the Taliban.
Allegations of connection to CIA
There have been many claims that the CIA directly supported the Taliban or al-Qaeda. In the early 1980s, the CIA and the ISI (Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence agency) provided arms and money, and the ISI helped gather radical Muslims from around the world to fight against the Soviet invaders. Osama Bin Laden was one of the key players in organizing training camps for the foreign Muslim volunteers. By 1987, 65,000 tons of U.S.-made weapons and ammunition a year were entering the war.
After 9/11, the United Kingdom froze the Taliban’s assets in the U.K., nearly $200 million by early October 2001. The U.K. also supported the U.S. decision to remove the Taliban, both politically and militarily.
The UN agreed that NATO would act on its behalf, focusing on counter-terrorist operations in Afghanistan after the Taliban had been “defeated”. The United Kingdom took operational responsibility for Helmand Province, a major poppy-growing province in southern Afghanistan, deploying troops there in the summer of 2006, and encountered resistance by re-formed Taliban forces allegedly entering Afghanistan from Pakistan. The Taliban turned towards the use of improvised explosive devices.
India is one of the Taliban’s most outspoken critics. India was concerned about growing Islamic militancy in its neighborhood, and refused to recognize the Taliban regime. Ahmad Shah Massoud also had close ties to India.
In December 1999, Indian Airlines Flight 814 en route from Kathmandu to Delhi was hijacked and taken to Kandahar. The Taliban moved its militias near the hijacked aircraft, supposedly to prevent Indian special forces from storming the aircraft, and stalled the negotiations between India and the hijackers for days. The New York Times later reported that there were credible links between the hijackers and the Taliban. As a part of the deal to free the plane, India released three militants. The Taliban gave a safe passage to the hijackers and the released militants.
Following the hijacking, India drastically increased its efforts to help Massoud, providing an arms depot in Dushanbe, Tajikistan. India also provided a wide range of high-altitude warfare equipment, helicopter technicians, medical services, and tactical advice. According to one report, Indian military support to anti-Taliban forces totaled US$70 million, including five Mil Mi-17 helicopters, and US$8 million worth of high-altitude equipment in 2001. India extensively supported the new administration in Afghanistan, leading several reconstruction projects and by 2001 had emerged as the country’s largest regional donor.
In the wake of recent terrorist attacks in India, there have been growing concerns about fundamentalist organisations such as the Taliban seeking to expand their activities into India. During the 2011 ICC Cricket World Cup which was co-hosted in India, Pakistani Interior Minister Rehman Malik and Interpol chief Ronald Noblerevealed that a terrorist bid to disrupt the tournament had been foiled; following a conference with Noble, Malik said that the Taliban had begun to base their activities in India with reports from neighboring countries exposing their activities in the country and a Sri Lankan terrorist planning to target cricketers was arrested in Colombo. Kashmir-based militant groups thought to have ties with the Taliban have historically been involved in the Jammu and Kashmir insurgency in Indian-administered Kashmir. In 2009, the Times of India called for India to reassess its Taliban threat.
United Nations and NGOs
A major issue during the Taliban’s reign was its relations with the United Nations (UN) and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Twenty years of continuous warfare had devastated Afghanistan’s infrastructure and economy. There was no running water, little electricity, few telephones, functioning roads or regular energy supplies. Basic necessities like water, food, housing and others were in desperately short supply. In addition, the clan and family structure that provided Afghans with a social/economic safety net was also badly damaged. Afghanistan’s infant mortality was the highest in the world. A full quarter of all children died before they reached their fifth birthday, a rate several times higher than most other developing countries.
International charitable and/or development organisations (NGOs) were extremely important to the supply of food, employment, reconstruction, and other services. With one million plus deaths during the years of war, the number of families headed by widows had reached 98,000 by 1998. Thus Taliban restrictions on women were sometime a matter not only of human rights, but of life and death. In Kabul, where vast portions of the city had been devastated from rocket attacks, more than half of its 1.2 million people benefited in some way from NGO activities, even for water to drink. The civil war and its never-ending refugee stream continued throughout the Taliban’s reign. The Mazar, Herat, and Shomali valley offensives displaced more than three-quarters of a million civilians, using “scorched earth” tactics to prevent them from supplying the enemy with aid.
Despite the aid, the Taliban’s attitude toward the UN and NGOs was often one of suspicion, in place of gratitude or even tolerance. The UN operates on the basis of international law, not Sharia, and the UN did not recognize the Taliban as the legitimate government of Afghanistan. Additionally, most foreign donors and aid workers, were non-Muslims. As the Taliban’s Attorney General Maulvi Jalil-ullah Maulvizada put it:
Let us state what sort of education the UN wants. This is a big infidel policy which gives such obscene freedom to women which would lead to adultery and herald the destruction of Islam. In any Islamic country where adultery becomes common, that country is destroyed and enters the domination of the infidels because their men become like women and women cannot defend themselves. Anyone who talks to us should do so within Islam’s framework. The Holy Koran cannot adjust itself to other people’s requirements, people should adjust themselves to the requirements of the Holy Koran.
Taliban decision-makers, particularly Mullah Omar, seldom if ever talked directly to non-Muslim foreigners, so aid providers had to deal with intermediaries whose approvals and agreements were often reversed. Around September 1997 the heads of three UN agencies in Kandahar were expelled from the country after protesting when a female attorney for the UN High Commissioner for Refugees was forced to talk from behind a curtain so her face would not be visible.
When the UN increased the number of Muslim women staff to satisfy Taliban demands, the Taliban then required all female Muslim UN staff traveling to Afghanistan to be chaperoned by a mahram or a blood relative. In July 1998, the Taliban closed “all NGO offices” by force after those organizations refused to move to a bombed-out former Polytechnic College as ordered. One month later the UN offices were also shut down. As food prices rose and conditions deteriorated, Planning Minister Qari Din Mohammed explained the Taliban’s indifference to the loss of humanitarian aid:
We Muslims believe God the Almighty will feed everybody one way or another. If the foreign NGOs leave then it is their decision. We have not expelled them.
In 2009 a top U.N official called for talks with Taliban leaders. In 2010 the U.N lifted sanctions on the Taliban, and requested that Taliban leaders and others be removed from terrorism watch lists. In 2010 the U.S. and Europe announced support for President Karzai’s latest attempt to negotiate peace with the Taliban.
- Griffiths, John C. (2001), Afghanistan: A History of Conflict, London: Carlton Books, ISBN 1-84222-597-9
- Rashid, Ahmed (2000), Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil and Fundamentalism in Central Asia, New Haven: Yale University Press, ISBN 0-300-08340-8
- ^ Jump up to:a b c “Pakistan: A Plethora of Problems” (PDF). Global Security Studies, Winter 2012, Volume 3, Issue 1, by Colin Price, School of Graduate and Continuing Studies in Diplomacy. Norwich University, Northfield, VT. Retrieved 2012-12-22.
- Jump up^ “Taliban and the Northern Alliance”. US Gov Info. About.com. Retrieved 2009-11-26.
- Jump up^ 9/11 seven years later: US ‘safe,’ South Asia in turmoil “There are now some 62,000 foreign soldiers in Afghanistan, including 34,000 US troops, and some 150,000 Afghan security forces. They face an estimated 7,000 to 11,000 insurgents, according to US commanders.”Retrieved 2010-08-24.
- Jump up^ Hamilton, Fiona; Coates, Sam; Savage, Michael (2010-03-03).“MajorGeneral Richard Barrons puts Taleban fighter numbers at 36000”.The Times (London).
- Jump up^ “Pakistan militants preparing for Afghanistan civil war”. Fox News. Retrieved 2013-09-29.
- Jump up^ Giustozzi, Antonio (2009). Decoding the new Taliban: insights from the Afghan field. Columbia University Press. p. 274. ISBN 978-0-231-70112-9.
- Jump up^ “Analysis: Who are the Taleban?”. BBC News. 2000-12-20.
- Jump up^ “From the article on the Taliban in Oxford Islamic Studies Online”. Oxford Islamic Studies. Retrieved 2010-08-27.
- Jump up^ Abrams, Dennis (2007). Hamid Karzai. Infobase Publishing. p. 14.ISBN 978-0-7910-9267-5. “As soon as it took power though, the Taliban imposed its strict interpretation of Islamic law on the country”
- Jump up^ Skain, Rosemarie (2002). The women of Afghanistan under the Taliban. McFarland. p. 41. ISBN 978-0-7864-1090-3.
- Jump up^ James Gerstenzan; Lisa Getter (November 18, 2001). “Laura Bush Addresses State of Afghan Women”. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved September 14, 2012.
- Jump up^ “Women’s Rights in the Taliban and Post-Taliban Eras”. A Woman Among Warlords. PBS. September 11, 2007. Retrieved September 14, 2012.
- Jump up^ Giustozzi, Antonio (2009). Decoding the new Taliban: insights from the Afghan field. Columbia University Press. p. 249. ISBN 978-0-231-70112-9.
- Jump up^ Clements, Frank A. (2003). Conflict in Afghanistan: An Encyclopedia (Roots of Modern Conflict). ABC-CLIO. p. 219.ISBN 978-1-85109-402-8.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Maley, William (2001).Fundamentalism Reborn? Afghanistan and the Taliban. C Hurst & Co. p. 14.ISBN 978-1-85065-360-8.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Shaffer, Brenda (2006). The limits of culture: Islam and foreign policy(illustrated ed.). MIT Press. p. 277.ISBN 978-0-262-69321-9. “The Taliban’s mindset is, however, equally if not more deaned by Pashtunwali”
- ^ Jump up to:a b Giraldo, Jeanne K. (2007).Terrorism Financing and State Responses: A Comparative Perspective. Stanford University Press. p. 96.ISBN 978-0-8047-5566-5. “Pakistan provided military support, including arms, ammunition, fuel, and military advisers, to the Taliban through its Directorate for Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI)”
- Jump up^ Nojumi, Neamatollah (2002). The Rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan: Mass Mobilization, Civil War and the Future of the Regio. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 127.ISBN 978-0-312-29584-4.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d “Pakistan’s support of the Taliban”. Human Rights Watch. 2000. “Of all the foreign powers involved in efforts to sustain and manipulate the ongoing fighting [in Afghanistan], Pakistan is distinguished both by the sweep of its objectives and the scale of its efforts, which include soliciting funding for the Taliban, bankrolling Taliban operations, providing diplomatic support as the Taliban’s virtual emissaries abroad, arranging training for Taliban fighters, recruiting skilled and unskilled manpower to serve in Taliban armies, planning and directing offensives, providing and facilitating shipments of ammunition and fuel, and … directly providing combat support.”
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Joscelyn, Thomas (2011-09-22).“Admiral Mullen: Pakistani ISI sponsoring Haqqani attacks”.The Long War Journal. Retrieved 2011-12-01. “During a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing today, Admiral Michael Mullen, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, highlighted the Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence Agency’s role in sponsoring the Haqqani Network – including attacks on American forces in Afghanistan. “The fact remains that the Quetta Shura [Taliban] and the Haqqani Network operate from Pakistan with impunity,” Mullen said in his written testimony. “Extremist organizations serving as proxies of the government of Pakistan are attacking Afghan troops and civilians as well as US soldiers.” Mullen continued: “For example, we believe the Haqqani Network–which has long enjoyed the support and protection of the Pakistani government and is, in many ways, a strategic arm of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence Agency–is responsible for the September 13th attacks against the U.S. Embassy in Kabul.””
- ^ Jump up to:a b Barnes, Julian E.; Matthew Rosenberg; Habib Khan Totakhil (2010-10-05). “Pakistan Urges On Taliban”. The Wall Street Journal. “the ISI wants us to kill everyone—policemen, soldiers, engineers, teachers, civilians—just to intimidate people,”
- ^ Jump up to:a b Researcher, CQ (2010). Issues in Terrorism and Homeland Security: Selections From CQ Researcher. Sage. p. 196. ISBN 978-1-4129-9201-5.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f “Afghanistan resistance leader feared dead in blast”. London: Ahmed Rashid in the Telegraph. 2001-09-11.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Marcela Grad.Massoud: An Intimate Portrait of the Legendary Afghan Leader (March 1, 2009 ed.). Webster University Press. p. 310.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c US attack on Taliban kills 23 in Pakistan,The New York Times, 2008-09-09
- Jump up^ Nojum, Neamatollah (2002). The Rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan: Mass Mobilization, Civil War and the Future of the Region. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 189.ISBN 978-0-312-29584-4.
- Jump up^ Rashid, Ahmed (2002). Taliban: Islam, Oil and the New Great Game in Central Asia. I.B.Tauris. p. 253.ISBN 978-1-86064-830-4.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g “Taliban massacres outlined for UN”. Chicago Tribune. October 2001.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f “Confidential UN report details mass killings of civilian villagers”. Newsday. newsday.org. 2001. Retrieved 2001-10-12.
- Jump up^ U.N. says Taliban starving hungry people for military agenda, Associated Press, 1998-01-07
- Jump up^ Goodson, Larry P. (2002).Afghanistan’s Endless War: State Failure, Regional Politics and the Rise of the Taliban. University of Washington Press. p. 121. ISBN 978-0-295-98111-6.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d “Re-Creating Afghanistan: Returning to Istalif”. NPR. 2002-08-01.
- Jump up^ ISAF has participating forces from 39 countries, including all 26 NATO members. See ISAF Troop Contribution Placement (PDF), NATO, 2007-12-05, archived from the original on 2009-11-09
- Jump up^ Skaine, Rosemarie (2009). Women of Afghanistan in the Post-Taliban Era: How Lives Have Changed and Where They Stand Today. McFarland. p. 41.ISBN 978-0-7864-3792-4.
- Jump up^ Shanty, Frank (2011). The Nexus: International Terrorism and Drug Trafficking from Afghanistan. Praeger. pp. 86–88. ISBN 978-0-313-38521-6.
- ^ Jump up to:a b “Citing rising death toll, UN urges better protection of Afghan civilians”. United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan. 9 March 2011. Archived from the original on 26 July 2011.
- Jump up^ Haddon, Katherine (6 October 2011).“Afghanistan marks 10 years since war started”. Agence France-Presse. Archived from the original on 10 October 2011.
- Jump up^ “UN: Taliban Responsible for 76% of Deaths in Afghanistan”. The Weekly Standard. 2010-08-10.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Pape, Robert Anthony; James K. Feldman (2010). Cutting the Fuse: The Explosion of Global Suicide Terrorism and How to Stop It. University of Chicago Press. p. 142. ISBN 978-0-226-64560-5. “The thinking piece of the Taliban is out of Quetta in Pakistan. It’s the major headquarters (Chris Vernon British Chief of Staff)”
- ^ Jump up to:a b Gall, Carlotta (2007-01-21). “At Border, Signs of Pakistani Role in Taliban Surge”. The New York Times.
- Jump up^ “English <-> Arabic Online Dictionary”. Online.ectaco.co.uk. 2006-12-28. Retrieved 2012-09-02.
- Jump up^ Adam Curtis. “From ‘Taleban’ to ‘Taliban'”. BBC. Retrieved 2012-09-02.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d “Blood-Stained Hands, Past Atrocities in Kabul and Afghanistan’s Legacy of Impunity”. Human Rights Watch.
- Jump up^ Neamatollah Nojumi. The Rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan: Mass Mobilization, Civil War, and the Future of the Region (2002 1st ed.). Palgrave, New York.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Amin Saikal (2006). Modern Afghanistan: A History of Struggle and Survival (1st ed.). London New York: I.B. Tauris & Co. p. 352. ISBN 1-85043-437-9.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Gutman, Roy (2008): How We Missed the Story: Osama Bin Laden, the Taliban and the Hijacking of Afghanistan, Endowment of the United States Institute of Peace, 1st ed., Washington DC.
- Jump up^ “The September 11 Sourcebooks Volume VII: The Taliban File”. George Washington University. 2003.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Matinuddin, Kamal, The Taliban Phenomenon, Afghanistan 1994–1997,Oxford University Press, (1999), pp. 25–6
- Jump up^ Rashid 2000, p. 25
- Jump up^ Felbab-Brow, Vanda (2010). Shooting up: counterinsurgency and the war on drugs. Brookings Institution Press. p. 122. ISBN 978-0-8157-0328-0.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Rashid 2000, pp. 27–29.
- ^ Jump up to:a b “II. Background”. Human Rights Watch.
- Jump up^ Rashid 2000, p. 29
- Jump up^ Goodson 2001, p. 114
- Jump up^ “Casting Shadows: War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity: 1978–2001”. Afghanistan Justice Project. 2005.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Amnesty International. “Document – Afghanistan: further information on fear for safety and new concern: deliberate and arbitrary killings: civilians in Kabul.” 16 November 1995 Accessed atAmnesty.org
- Jump up^ “Afghanistan: escalation of indiscriminate shelling in Kabul”. International Committee of the Red Cross. 1995.
- Jump up^ “A conversation about recent events in Afghanistan”. Charlie Rose. March 26, 2001.
- Jump up^ “He would have found Bin Laden”. CNN. 2009-05-27.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f “Documents Detail Years of Pakistani Support for Taliban, Extremists”. George Washington University. 2007.
- Jump up^ Coll, Ghost Wars (New York: Penguin, 2005), 14.
- Jump up^ Marcin, Gary (1998). “The Taliban”. King’s College. Retrieved 2011-09-26.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Forsythe, David P. (2009).Encyclopedia of human rights (Volume 1 ed.). Oxford University Press. p. 2.ISBN 978-0-19-533402-9. “In 1994 the Taliban was created, funded and inspired by Pakistan”
- Jump up^ Gardner, Hall (2007). American global strategy and the ‘war on terrorism’. Ashgate. p. 59. ISBN 978-0-7546-7094-0.
- Jump up^ Jones, Owen Bennett (2003).Pakistan: eye of the storm. Yale University Press. p. 240. ISBN 978-0-300-10147-8. “The ISI’s undemocratic tendencies are not restricted to its interference in the electoral process. The organisation also played a major role in creating the Taliban movement.”
- Jump up^ Randal, Jonathan (2005). Osama: The Making of a Terrorist. I.B.Tauris. p. 26.ISBN 978-1-84511-117-5. “Pakistan had all but invented the Taliban, the so-called Koranic students”
- Jump up^ Peiman, Hooman (2003). Falling Terrorism and Rising Conflicts. Greenwood. p. 14. ISBN 978-0-275-97857-0. “Pakistan was the main supporter of the Taliban since its military intelligence, the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) formed the group in 1994”
- Jump up^ Hilali, A. Z. (2005). US-Pakistan relationship: Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Ashgate. p. 248. ISBN 978-0-7546-4220-6.
- Jump up^ Rumer, Boris Z. (2002). Central Asia: a gathering storm?. M.E. Sharpe. p. 103.ISBN 978-0-7656-0866-6.
- Jump up^ Harf, James E.; Mark Owen Lombard (2004). The Unfolding Legacy of 9/11. University Press of America. p. 122.ISBN 978-0-7618-3009-2.
- Jump up^ Hinnells, John R. (2006). Religion and violence in South Asia: theory and practice. Routledge. p. 154. ISBN 978-0-415-37290-9.
- Jump up^ Boase, Roger (2010). Islam and Global Dialogue: Religious Pluralism and the Pursuit of Peace. Ashgate. p. 85.ISBN 978-1-4094-0344-9. “Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence agency used the students from these madrassas, the Taliban, to create a favourable regime in Afghanistan”
- ^ Jump up to:a b Armajani, Jon (2012). Modern Islamist Movements: History, Religion, and Politics. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 48.ISBN 978-1-4051-1742-5.
- Jump up^ Bayo, Ronald H. (2011). Multicultural America: An Encyclopedia of the Newest Americans. Greenwood. p. 8. ISBN 978-0-313-35786-2.
- Jump up^ Goodson, Larry P. (2002).Afghanistan’s Endless War: State Failure, Regional Politics and the Rise of the Taliban. University of Washington Press. p. 111. ISBN 978-0-295-98111-6. “Pakistani support for the Taliban included direct and indirect military involvement, logistical support”
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Maley, William (2009). The Afghanistan wars. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 288. ISBN 978-0-230-21313-5.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d Tomsen, Peter (2011). Wars of Afghanistan. PublicAffairs. p. 322.ISBN 978-1-58648-763-8.
- Jump up^ Edward Girardet. Killing the Cranes: A Reporter’s Journey Through Three Decades of War in Afghanistan (August 3, 2011 ed.). Chelsea Green Publishing. p. 416.
- Jump up^ Rashid 2000, p. 91
- ^ Jump up to:a b c “Inside the Taliban”.National Geographic Society. 2007.
- Jump up^ Clements, Frank (2003). Conflict in Afghanistan: a historical encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. p. 54. ISBN 978-1-85109-402-8.
- Jump up^ Constable, Pamela (1998-09-16).“Afghanistan: Arena for a New Rivalry”. The Washington Post.
- Jump up^ “Pak involved in Taliban offensive – Russia”. Express India. 1998.
- Jump up^ “Afghanistan & the United Nations”. United Nations. 2012.
- Jump up^ “U.S. presses for bin Laden’s ejection”.The Washington Times. 2001.
- Jump up^ Byman, Daniel (2005). Deadly connections: states that sponsor terrorism. Cambridge University Press. p. 195. ISBN 978-0-521-83973-0.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Atkins, Stephen E. (2011). The 9/11 Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. p. 540.ISBN 978-1-59884-921-9.
- Jump up^ Litwak, Robert (2007). Regime change: U.S. strategy through the prism of 9/11. Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 309. ISBN 978-0-8018-8642-3.
- Jump up^ McGrath, Kevin (2011). Confronting Al-Qaeda. Naval Institute Press. p. 138.ISBN 978-1-59114-503-5. “the Pakistani military’s Inter-services Intelligence Directorate (IsI) provided assistance to the taliban regime, to include its military and al Qaeda–related terrorist training camps”
- ^ Jump up to:a b “Book review: The inside track on Afghan wars by Khaled Ahmed”. Daily Times. 2008.
- Jump up^ “Brigade 055”. CNN.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Lansford, Tom (2011). 9/11 and the Wars in Afghanistan and Iraq: A Chronology and Reference Guide. ABC-CLIO. p. 37. ISBN 978-1-59884-419-1.
- Jump up^ Lall, Marie (2008). Karl R. DeRouen, ed. International security and the United States: an encyclopedia (Volume 1 ed.). Praeger. p. 10. ISBN 978-0-275-99254-5.
- Jump up^ Hussain, Zahid (2007). Frontline Pakistan: The Struggle With Militant Islam. Columbia University Press. p. 49.ISBN 0-85368-769-2. “However, Pakistani intelligence agencies maintained some degree of cooperation with the Taliban elements fleeing the fighting.”
- ^ Jump up to:a b Hersh, Seymour M. (2002-01-28).“The Getaway”. The New Yorker. Retrieved 2008-02-15.
- Jump up^ Morgan, Matthew J. (2007). A Democracy Is Born: An Insider’s Account of the Battle Against Terrorism in Afghanistan. Praeger. p. 166.ISBN 978-0-275-99999-5.
- Jump up^ Musharraf, Pervez (2006). In the line of fire: a memoir. The Free Press. p. 201.ISBN 978-0-7432-8344-1.
- Jump up^ Gartenstein-Ross, Daveed (2011). Bin Laden’s Legacy: Why We’re Still Losing the War on Terror. Wiley. p. 189.ISBN 978-1-118-15095-5.
- Jump up^ Hansen, Stig Jarle (2010). The Borders of Islam: Exploring Huntington’s Faultlines, from Al-Andalus to the Virtual Ummah. Columbia University Press. p. 77. ISBN 978-0-231-15422-2.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Riedel, Bruce O. (2011). Deadly embrace: Pakistan, America, and the future of the global jihad. Brookings Institution Press. p. 65. ISBN 978-0-8157-0557-4.
- Jump up^ Marcela Grad. Massoud: An Intimate Portrait of the Legendary Afghan Leader(March 1, 2009 ed.). Webster University Press. p. 310.
- Jump up^ “Inside the Taliban”. National Geographic Society. 2007.
- ^ Jump up to:a b “The Last Interview with Ahmad Shah Massoud”. Piotr Balcerowicz. 2001.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Steve Coll. Ghost Wars: The Secret History of the CIA, Afghanistan, and Bin Laden, from the Soviet Invasion to September 10, 2001 (February 23, 2004 ed.). Penguin Press HC. p. 720.
- Jump up^ “The man who would have led Afghanistan”. St. Petersburg Times. 2002.
- Jump up^ “The lost lion of Kabul”. The New Statesman. 2011.
- Jump up^ “Council of Afghan opposition”. Corbis. 2001.
- Jump up^ Marcela Grad. Massoud: An Intimate Portrait of the Legendary Afghan Leader(1 March 2009 ed.). Webster University Press. p. 65.
- Jump up^ “Massoud in the European Parliament 2001”. EU media. 2001.
- Jump up^ “Massoud in the European Parliament 2001”. EU media. 2001.
- Jump up^ Defense Intelligence Agency (2001) report GWU.edu
- Jump up^ “” (2001-03-05). “see video”. YouTube. Retrieved 2010-10-31.
- Jump up^ “Taliban Foe Hurt and Aide Killed by Bomb”. The New York Times(Afghanistan). 2001-09-10. Retrieved 2010-08-27.
- Jump up^ Burns, John F. (2002-09-09). “Threats and responses: assassination; Afghans, Too, Mark a Day of Disaster: A Hero Was Lost”. The New York Times(Afghanistan). Retrieved 2010-08-27.
- Jump up^ Boettcher, Mike (2003-11-06). “How much did Afghan leader know?”. CNN. Archived from the original on 2008-08-20.
- ^ Jump up to:a b “The Man Who Knew”. PBS. 2002.
- Jump up^ “Transcript of President Bush’s address”. CNN. 2001-09-21. Retrieved 2010-08-27.
- Jump up^ United Nations S.C. Res. 1368, September 12, 2001; S.C. Res. 1373, 2001-09-28.
- Jump up^ Statement by the North Atlantic Council, September 12, 2001, in Press Release 124.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Burns, John F. “Pakistan Says Taliban Demands Evidence That Bin Laden Is Tied to Attacks.” The New York Times. 2001-09-18
- Jump up^ “US resolute on Bin Laden hunt
- ^ Jump up to:a b Jones, Gary and Francis, Wayne. “WAR ON TERROR: MUSLIM ANGER.” The Mirror. 2001-09-22
- Jump up^ “Taliban ‘will try Bin Laden if US provides evidence'”. The Guardian. October 5, 2001.
- Jump up^ “America Speaks Out: What’s the Next Threat?” TalkBack Live. CNN. 2001-10-1
- Jump up^ Helen, Kennedy. “Taliban Mock U.s., Say They’re Hiding Osama Warn Washington To Rethink Assault.” Daily News. 2001-10-01
- Jump up^ “Briefing 05: The Smoking Gun”. J-n-v.org. 2001-10-08. Retrieved 2012-09-02.
- Jump up^ Bishop, P., Pakistan blocks bin Laden trial, The Daily Telegraph, 2001-10-04. Also known in print as “Pakistan halts secret plan for bin Laden trial”.
- Jump up^ “Taliban offers to try bin Laden in an Islamic court”. CNN. October 7, 2001. Archived from the original on June 14, 2004.
- Jump up^ “Afghanistan wakes after night of intense bombings. CNN: Oct. 7, 2001”. CNN. Retrieved 2012-09-02.
- Jump up^ John Pike. “Operation Enduring Freedom”. Globalsecurity.org. Retrieved 2012-09-02.
- Jump up^ John Pike (2001-10-07). “Intentions of U.S. military operation”. Globalsecurity.org. Retrieved 2012-09-02.
- Jump up^ Lehman, John (2006-08-31). “We’re Not Winning This War”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 2009-12-03.
- Jump up^ “Taliban offers to hand bin Laden to a neutral nation for trial”. The Guardian. Retrieved 2012-09-02.
- Jump up^ Ratnescar, Romesh (2002-10-10).“Afghanistan: One year on”. Time. Retrieved 2011-11-05.
- Jump up^ Moran, Michael (2001-11-29). “The ‘airlift of evil’”. MSNBC. Retrieved 2008-02-15.
- Jump up^ Press Trust of India (2002-01-24).“India protests airlift of Pakistani fighters from Kunduz”. The Indian Express. Retrieved 2011-11-05.
- Jump up^ George, Marcus (2001-11-26).“Kunduz celebrates end of siege”. BBC News. Retrieved 2008-02-15.
- Jump up^ Rashid, Ahmed (2008). Descent into Chaos: The United States and the Failure of Nation Building in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Central Asia. United States: Viking Press. ISBN 978-0-670-01970-0.
- Jump up^ “npr: Truck Accident Sparks Riots in Afghanistan”. Retrieved 2010-07-01.
- Jump up^ Constable, Pamela (2006-06-01).“U.S. troops fired at mob after Kabul accident”. The Washington Post(Washington). p. 1.
- Jump up^ “Countering the insurgency in Afghanistan, Losing friends and making enemies” The Senlis Council (PDF), pp.77–90, archived from the original on 11 July 2007.
- Jump up^ “Poppy for Medicine” The Senlis Council (PDF), archived from the original on 30 September 2007.
- Jump up^ “Pakistan Security Research Unit (PSRU)”. Spaces.brad.ac.uk:8080. 1999-02-22. Retrieved 2012-09-02.
- Jump up^ Shahzad, Syed Saleem (2006-09-08).“Pakistan: Hello Al-Qaeda, goodbye America”. Asia Times. Retrieved 2006-09-12.
- Jump up^ Harnden, Toby (2010-12-11). “Man on a mission. US defence Secretary Robert Gates is still hungry for the fight in Afghanistan”. The Daily Telegraph (London).
- Jump up^ Gall, Carlotta. “Taliban”. The New York Times.
- Jump up^ “Empowering “Soft” Taliban Over “Hard” Taliban: Pakistan’s Counter-Terrorism Strategy by Sadia Sulaiman”..
- ^ Jump up to:a b “Asia Times Online :: South Asia news, business and economy from India and Pakistan”. Asia Times. 2009-12-17. Retrieved 2010-08-27.
- Jump up^ Larcombe, Duncan (11 February 2010). “SAS assassinate Taliban commanders”. The Sun. Retrieved 23 September 2013.(subscription required (help)).
- Jump up^ OARDEC (2008). Unclassified Summary of Administrative Review Board Proceedings (pp. 651–742). United States Department of Defense, pp. 685–90 , retrieved 16 August 2013.
- Jump up^ 31 December 2011 (2011-12-31).“Taliban spokesman: Cruel behavior was necessary”. Tolonews.com. Retrieved 2012-09-01.
- Jump up^ “Associated Press: U.N. says Taliban starving hungry people for military agenda”. Nl.newsbank.com. 1998-01-07. Retrieved 2012-09-01.
- Jump up^ Clements, Frank (2003). Conflict in Afghanistan: a historical encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. p. 106. ISBN 978-1-85109-402-8.
- Jump up^ Gutman, Roy (2008). How We Missed the Story: Osama Bin Laden, the Taliban, and the Hijacking of Afghanistan. Institute of Peace Press. p. 142. ISBN 978-1-60127-024-5.
- Jump up^ Tripathi, Deepak (2011). Breeding Ground: Afghanistan and the Origins of Islamist Terrorism. Potomac. p. 116.ISBN 978-1-59797-530-8.
- Jump up^ Coburn, Noah (2011). Bazaar Politics: Power and Pottery in an Afghan Market Town. Stanford University Press. p. 13.ISBN 0804776725.
- Jump up^ Clements, Frank (2003). Conflict in Afghanistan: a historical encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. p. 112. ISBN 978-1-85109-402-8.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g “Lifting The Veil On Taliban Sex Slavery”. Time. 2002-02-10.
- Jump up^ “Movies” (MPG). Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan (RAWA). Archived from the original on 25 March 2009.
- Jump up^ “The Taliban’s War on Women” PDF, Physicians for Human Rights, August 1998.
- Jump up^ Dupree Hatch, Nancy. “Afghan Women under the Taliban” in Maley, William.Fundamentalism Reborn? Afghanistan and the Taliban. London: Hurst and Company, 2001, pp. 145–166.
- Jump up^ Wertheime, Molly Meijer (2004).Leading Ladies of the White House: Communication Strategies of Notable Twentieth-Century First Ladies. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 253. ISBN 978-0-7425-3672-2.
- Jump up^ Cooke, Miriam (2006). Daniel J. Sherman, ed. Terror, Culture, Politics: 9/11 Reconsidere. Indiana University Press. p. 177. ISBN 978-0-253-34672-8.
- Jump up^ Moghadam, Valentine M. (2003).Modernizing women: gender and social change in the Middle East (2nd Revised ed.). Lynne Rienner. p. 266. ISBN 978-1-58826-171-7.
- Jump up^ Massoumi, Mejgan (2010). Nezar AlSayyad, ed. The fundamentalist city?: religiosity and the remaking of urban space. Routledge. p. 223. ISBN 978-0-415-77935-7.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Skaine, Rosemarie (2009). Women of Afghanistan in the Post-Taliban Era: How Lives Have Changed and Where They Stand Today. McFarland. p. 57.ISBN 978-0-7864-3792-4.
- Jump up^ Rashid, Ahmed. Taliban. Yale Nota Bene Books, 2000, p.106.
- Jump up^ Rashid, Ahmed. Taliban. Yale Nota Bene Books, 2000, p. 70.
- Jump up^ Kegley, Charles W.; Shannon L Blanton (2011). World Politics: Trend and Transformation. Cengage. p. 230.ISBN 978-0-495-90655-1.
- Jump up^ “Human Rights News, Afghanistan: Civilians Bear Cost of Escalating Insurgent Attacks”. Human Rights Watch. 2007-04-17. Retrieved 2012-09-02.
- Jump up^ “The Consequences of Insurgent Attacks in Afghanistan, April 2007, Volume 19, No. 6(C)”. Human Rights Watch. 2007-04-16. Retrieved 2012-09-02.
- Jump up^ “South Asia | UK charity worker killed in Kabul”. BBC News. 2008-10-20. Retrieved 2009-11-26.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Ben Arnoldy (2009-07-31). “In Afghanistan, Taliban kills more civilians than US”.
- Jump up^ “The UN Goldstone Commission: A Lesson in Farcical Hypocrisy, Defense Update. By David Eshel”. Defense-update.com. Retrieved 2012-09-02.
- Jump up^ Israel and the New Way of War, The Journal of International Security Affairs, Spring 2010 – Number 18
- ^ Jump up to:a b Babakarkhail, Z.; Nelson, D. (13 May 2013). “Taliban renounces war on anti-polio workers”. The Telegraph. Retrieved 27 May 2013.
- Jump up^ Walsh, D. (18 June 2012). “Taliban Block Vaccinations in Pakistan”. The New York Times. Retrieved 27 May 2013.
- Jump up^ “Gunmen kill 4 female polio workers in Pakistan” (18 December 2012),Yahoo! News, The Associated Press. Retrieved 10 September 2013.
- Jump up^ Graham-Harrison, E. (12 March 2013).“Taliban stopping polio vaccinations, says Afghan governor”. Guardian. Retrieved 27 May 2013.
- Jump up^ CBC News (14 May 2013). “Taliban pledge support for Afghan polio campaign”.CBC News. Retrieved 27 May 2013.
- Jump up^ Encyclopedia of Islam and the Muslim world / editor in chief, Richard C. Martin, Macmillan Reference USA : Thomson/Gale, c2004
- ^ Jump up to:a b Encyclopedia of Islam and the Muslim World, (2004).
- Jump up^ Rashid 2000, pp. 132, 139.
- Jump up^ Rashid 2000, p. 87.
- Jump up^ Waldman, Amy
- Jump up^ “US Country Report on Human Rights Practices – Afghanistan 2001”. State.gov. 2002-03-04. Retrieved 2012-09-02.
- Jump up^ Roy, Olivier, Globalized Islam, Columbia University Press, 2004, p. 239.
- Jump up^ Rashid 2000, p. 92.
- Jump up^ “Foreign Military Studies Office, “Whither the Taliban?” by Mr. Ali A. Jalali and Mr. Lester W. Grau”. Fas.org. Retrieved 2012-09-02.
- Jump up^ “IV. Incitement of violence against Hazaras by governor Niazi”, Human Rights Watch Report, `Afghanistan, the massacre in Mazar-e-Sharif`, November 1998., Human Rights Watch, retrieved 2011-12-01
- ^ Jump up to:a b Rashid 2000, p. 107.
- Jump up^ Griffiths 227.
- Jump up^ Luke Harding (2001-03-03). “How the Buddha got his wounds”. The Guardian (London). Retrieved 2010-08-27.
- Jump up^ Yahya Massoud (July 2010). “Afghans Can Win This War”.Foreign Policy.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Rashid 2000, p. 32.
- Jump up^ Rashid 2000, p. 111.
- Jump up^ “”Taliban publicly execute woman”, Associated Press, November 17, 1999″. Rawa.org. Retrieved 2012-09-02.
- Jump up^ Antonowicz, Anton. ‘Zarmina’s story”,Daily Mirror, June 20, 2002
- Jump up^ “Zarmeena” (MPG). Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan (RAWA). Archived from the original on 17 November 2006.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Rashid 2000, pp. 41–42.
- Jump up^ Griffiths 226.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Rashid 2000, p. 98.
- Jump up^ Rashid 2000, p. 43 Interview with Mullah Wakil, March 1996
- Jump up^ Rashid 2000, p. 95.
- Jump up^ Interview with Taliban spokesman Mullah Wakil in Arabic magazine Al-Majallah, 1996-10-23.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Rashid 2000, pp. 39–40.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Rashid 2000, pp. 101–102.
- Jump up^ Rashid 2000, p. 5.
- Jump up^ Rashid 2000, p. 100.
- Jump up^ Dixon, Robyn (13 October 2001).“Afghans in Kabul Flee Taliban, Not U.S. Raids”. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 11 December 2012.
- Jump up^ Marsden, Peter (1998). The Taliban: war, religion and the new order in Afghanistan. Zed Books. p. 51.ISBN 978-1-85649-522-6.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Pugh, Michael C.; Neil Cooper Jonathan Goodhand (2004). War Economies in a Regional Context: Challenges of Transformation. Lynne Rienner. p. 48. ISBN 978-1-58826-211-0.
- Jump up^ Castillo, Graciana del (2008).Rebuilding War-Torn States: The Challenge of Post-Conflict Economic Reconstruction. Oxford University Press. p. 167. ISBN 978-0-19-923773-9.
- Jump up^ Skaine, Rosemarie (2009). Women of Afghanistan in the Post-Taliban Era: How Lives Have Changed and Where They Stand Today. McFarland. p. 58.ISBN 978-0-7864-3792-4.
- Jump up^ Nojum, Neamatollah (2002). The Rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan: Mass Mobilization, Civil War and the Future of the Region. St Martin’s Press. p. 178.ISBN 978-0-312-29584-4.
- Jump up^ Nojum, Neamatollah (2002). The Rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan: Mass Mobilization, Civil War and the Future of the Region. St Martin’s Press. p. 186.ISBN 978-0-312-29584-4.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j Chouvy, Pierre-Arnaud (2010). Opium: uncovering the politics of the poppy. Harvard University Press. pp. 52ff.
- Jump up^ Thourni, Francisco E. (2006). Frank Bovenkerk, ed. The Organized Crime Community: Essays in Honor of Alan A. Block. Springer. p. 130. ISBN 978-0-387-39019-2.
- Jump up^ Lyman, Michael D. (2010). Drugs in Society: Causes, Concepts and Control. Elsevier. p. 309. ISBN 978-1-4377-4450-7.
- Jump up^ Griffin, Michael (2000). Reaping the whirlwind: the Taliban movement in Afghanistan. Pluto Press. p. 147.ISBN 978-0-7453-1274-3.
- Jump up^ Wehr, Kevin (2011). Green Culture: An A-to-Z Guide. Sage. p. 223. ISBN 978-1-4129-9693-8.
- Jump up^ Rashid, Ahmed (2002). Taliban: Islam, oil and the new great game in central Asia. I.B.Tauris. p. 187.ISBN 978-1-86064-830-4.
- Jump up^ Clements, Frank (2003). Conflict in Afghanistan: a historical encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. p. 148. ISBN 978-1-85109-402-8.
- Jump up^ Bennett, Adam (2005). Reconstructing Afghanistan (illustrated ed.). International Monetary Fund. p. 29.ISBN 978-1-58906-324-2.
- Jump up^ Farah, Douglas; Stephen Braun (2008). Merchant of Death: Money, Guns, Planes, and the Man Who Makes War Possible. Wiley. p. 146. ISBN 978-0-470-26196-5.
- Jump up^ Askari, Hossein (2003). Economic sanctions: examining their philosophy and efficacy. Potomac. p. 56. ISBN 978-1-56720-542-8.
- Jump up^ Pillar, Paul R. (2003). Terrorism and U.S. foreign policy. Brookings Institution. p. 77. ISBN 978-0-8157-7077-0.
- Jump up^ Rashid 2000, p. 26.
- Jump up^ Julian West (2001-09-23). “Pakistan’s godfathers of the Taliban hold the key to the hunt for Bin Laden”. The Daily Telegraph (London).
- Jump up^ Carlotta Gall (2010-03-03). “Former Pakistani officer embodies policy puzzle”. The New York Times.
- Jump up^ Crisis of Impunity (Report). Human Rights Watch. July 2001.
- Jump up^ Frantz 2001
- Jump up^ Rashid 2000, pp. 185–186
- Jump up^ Rashid 2000, pp. 93, 137.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e “The ISI and Terrorism: Behind the Accusations – Council on Foreign Relations”. Cfr.org. Retrieved 2011-12-01.
- Jump up^ “Discussion Papers”. Retrieved 2010-12-12.
- Jump up^ “Afghan ex-intel chief opposed Karzai peace plan”. Reuters. 2010-06-08.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Chris Allbritton (2011-10-27).“Pakistan strongly denied Thursday a BBC report that alleged the Pakistani military, along with its intelligence arm, supplied and protected the Afghan Taliban and al Qaeda.”. Reuters. Retrieved Oct 27, 2011.
- Jump up^ Shuja, Nawaz. “The US-Pakistan Roller Coaster Relationship”. Huffington Post. Retrieved 2007-11-14.
- Jump up^ Jayshree Bajoria. “The Strained U.S.-Pakistan Alliance”. Retrieved 2010-10-22.
- Jump up^ “U.S.-Pakistan relations: An unhappy alliance”. Los Angeles Times. 2011-05-07. Retrieved 2011-12-01.
- Jump up^ “Pakistan warns U.S. it may lose key ally”. Macleans.ca. 2011-09-23. Retrieved 2011-12-01.
- Jump up^ “The World Today – Pakistan denies terror links”. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. 1980-10-02. Retrieved 2011-12-01.
- Jump up^ Tighe, Paul and Katz, Ian (2009-08-10). “Pakistan Challenges Taliban to Show Leader Mehsud Still Alive”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 2009-08-09.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Shane, Scott (2009-10-22).“Insurgents Share a Name, but Pursue Different Goals”. The New York Times (The New York Times Company). Retrieved 2011-01-26.
- ^ Jump up to:a b UNSC slaps sanctions on Pakistani Taliban, July 30, 2011, rediff.com
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Carlotta Gall, Ismail Khan, Pir Zubair Shah and Taimoor Shah (2009-03-26). “Pakistani and Afghan Taliban Unify in Face of US Influx”. The New York Times. Retrieved 2009-03-27.
- Jump up^ U.S. attack on Taliban kills 23 in Pakistan,The New York Times, 2008-09-09
- Jump up^ Spak, Kevin (2011-10-03). “Haqqani Denies Link With Pakistan – And insists it didn’t assassinate peace envoy Burhanuddin Rabbani”. Newser.com. Retrieved 2011-12-01.
- Jump up^ “Haqqani denies links to Pakistani government”. Army Times. Retrieved 2011-12-01.
- Jump up^ Mullen, Mike (30 September 2011).“Pakistan denies links to Haqqani network”. Windsorstar.com. Reuters. Retrieved 10 September 2013.
- Jump up^ “Haqqani network denies links to ISI: BBC”. The Express Tribune. Agence France-Presse. Retrieved 2011-12-01.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d Mayo, Akbar (2011-06-08). “Rise of Malakand Taliban”. The Daily Outlook Afghanistan. Retrieved 2011-12-01.
- Jump up^ Wright 2006, pp. 246–247, 287–288.
- Jump up^ Wright 2006, pp. 288–289.
- Jump up^ Rashid 2000, p. 139.
- Jump up^ International Terrorism And the Case Of Usama bin Laden, Lebanese Army Website, archived from the original on 11 March 2011.
- Jump up^ However, Lawrence Wright claims bin Laden was almost completely broke at this time, cut off from his family income and fleeced by the Sudanese.Wright 2006, pp. 222–223.
- Jump up^ “Indictments”(PDF). Retrieved 2012-09-02.
- Jump up^ “Taliban confirms bin Laden is missing”. CNN. February 14, 1999. Archived from the original on October 23, 2008.
- Jump up^ “Taliban Won’t Turn Over Bin Laden”. CBS News. 2001-09-21. Retrieved 2007-07-07.
- Jump up^ “Osama bin Laden ‘innocent'”. BBC News. 1998-11-21. Retrieved 2011-11-17.
- Jump up^ “Embassy bombing defendant linked to bin Laden”. CNN. February 14, 2001. Archived fromthe original on 2006-02-26.
- Jump up^ “Cooperative Research records of evidence against bin Laden”. Cooperativeresearch.org. Retrieved 2012-09-02.
- Jump up^ Bin Laden, Messages to the World,(2006), p.143, from Interview published in Al-Quds Al-Arabi in London, Nov. 12, 2001 (originally published in Pakistani daily, Ausaf, Nov. 7), shortly before the Northern Alliance entry into Kabul.
- Jump up^ “Sources: Taliban split with al Qaeda, seek peace”. CNN. Archived from the original on August 5, 2004.
- Jump up^ Brinkerhoff, Noel (2011-02-09).“Surprise! Taliban and Al-Qaeda are Worlds Apart”. Allgov.com. Retrieved 2011-12-01.
- Jump up^ Rashid 2000, pp. 74–75.
- Jump up^ Pike, John (1998-09-15). “Iranian-Afghan tensions”. Globalsecurity.org. Retrieved 2011-12-01.
- Jump up^ “Gates Warns Iran Over Afghan ‘Double Game'”. CBS News. Retrieved 2011-12-01.
- Jump up^ “US General Accuses Iran Of Helping Taliban”. Eagleworldnews.com. 2010-05-31. Retrieved 2011-12-01.
- Jump up^ Meyer, Henry (2009-02-14). “Iran Is Helping Taliban in Afghanistan, Petraeus Says (Update1)”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 2011-12-01.
- Jump up^ Jha, Lalit K (2011-03-16). “Concern in US over increasing Iranian activity in Afghanistan”. Pajhwok Afghan News (PAN). Retrieved 2011-01-13.
- Jump up^ Rashid 2000, p. 176.
- Jump up^ Rashid 2000, pp. 175–8.
- Jump up^ Rashid 2000, p. 177.
- Jump up^ “US pledges support for Afghan oil pipeline if Taliban makes peace”. BBC News. 1997-12-10. Retrieved 2010-04-09.
- Jump up^ Reuters, “Taliban blame Clinton scam for attacks”, 1998-08-21.
- Jump up^ Rashid 2000, pp. 138, 231.
- Jump up^ Rashid 2000, p. 78.
- Jump up^ “U.S. set to pay Taliban members to switch sides”. CNN. 2009-10-29. Retrieved 2010-04-09.
- Jump up^ “IPS Inter Press Service”. Ipsnews.net. Retrieved 2010-08-27.
- Jump up^ “Right after interviewing Karzai”. CNN. 2009-12-06. Retrieved 2010-04-09.
- Jump up^ Homan, Timothy R. (2009-12-06).“Talks With Taliban Not Ruled Out, U.S. Officials Say (Update1)”. bloomberg.com. Retrieved 2010-08-27.
- Jump up^ “Pentagon sees reconciliation with Taliban”. stuff.co.nz. Reuters. 2001-09-11. Retrieved 2010-08-27.
- Jump up^ “McChrystal focuses on peace with Taliban: report”. Google. AFP. 2010-01-24. Retrieved 2010-08-27.
- Jump up^ Fitchett, Joseph (2001-09-26). “What About the Taliban’s Stingers?”. The International Herald Tribune. Retrieved 2008-11-11.
- Jump up^ “AM Archive – UK freezes $200 million worth of Taliban assets”. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 2010-11-04.
- Jump up^ Conflict in Afghanistan: a … – Google Books. Books.google.com. 2003. ISBN 978-1-85109-402-8. Retrieved 2010-11-04.
- Jump up^ “General Sir Michael Jackson: We must maintain our will in Afghanistan”. The Daily Telegraph (London). 2008-06-21. Retrieved 2010-11-04.
- Jump up^ Meo, Nick (2008-08-09). “British cash to buy off Taliban ‘goes to farmers'”. The Daily Telegraph(London). Retrieved 2010-04-09.
- Jump up^ “UK news”. The Guardian (London). 2008-01-23. Retrieved 2010-04-09.
- Jump up^ ”The idea of Pakistan”, by Stephen P. Cohen. Books.google.com. Retrieved 2012-09-02.
- Jump up^ “Massoud joins hands with India”. Rawa.org. 1999-07-01. Retrieved 2012-09-02.
- Jump up^ “Bombay terrorist reveals links with IC 814 hijackers”. Rediff.com. Retrieved 2012-09-02.
- Jump up^ “India reaches out to Afghanistan”. Asia Times. 2005-08-30. Retrieved 2012-09-02.
- Jump up^ Sreedhar, T., “India’s Afghan policy” (7 March 2003), The Hindu, Government of India, Ministry of External Affairs. Retrieved 10 September 2013.
- Jump up^ Bedi, Rahul,“India joins anti-Taliban coalition”, (15 March 2001), Jane’s Intelligence Review, archived from the original on 16 February 2006.
- Jump up^ Mcleod, Duncan. ”India and Pakistan”,. Books.google.com. Retrieved 2012-09-02.
- Jump up^ Tharoor, Ishaan (2009-12-05). “India, Pakistan and the Battle for Afghanistan”. Time. Retrieved 2010-08-27.
- Jump up^ “India: Afghanistan’s influential ally”. BBC News. 2009-10-08. Retrieved 2010-08-27.
- Jump up^ Bajoria, Jayshree (2009-07-22). “India-Afghanistan Relations”. Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved 2010-08-27.
- Jump up^ Gishkori, Zahid. “Terrorism threat in India during World Cup”. Tribune.com.pk. Retrieved 2011-12-01.
- Jump up^ “Taliban trying to enter India: Malik”. The News. 2011-03-24. Retrieved 2011-12-01.
- Jump up^ “Terrorist plotting World Cup attack nabbed: Rehman Malik”. The Times of India. 2011-03-24. Retrieved 2011-12-01.
- Jump up^ Gall, Carlotta (2007-01-21). “At Border, Signs of Pakistani Role in Taliban Surge – New York Times”. The New York Times. Retrieved 2011-12-01.
- Jump up^ “India forced to reassess Taliban threat”. The Times of India. 2009-03-31. Retrieved 2011-12-01.
- Jump up^ Rashid 2000, p. 126.
- Jump up^ UNCP Country Development Indicators, 1995.
- Jump up^ “Quoting the ICRC”. Blackwell-synergy.com. 2005-12-21. Retrieved 2012-09-02.
- Jump up^ Rashid 2000, p. 72.
- Jump up^ Rashid 2000, pp. 64, 78.
- Jump up^ Maulvi Jalil-ullah Maulvizada, June 1997 interview with Ahmed Rashid;Rashid 2000, pp. 111–112.
- Jump up^ Rashid 2000, p. 65.
- Jump up^ Rashid 2000, p. 71.
- Jump up^ Aid agencies pull out of Kabul The building had neither electricity or running water.
- Jump up^ Rashid 2000, pp. 71–72.
- Jump up^ Agence France-Presse, “Taliban reject warnings of aid pull-out”, 1998-07-16.
- Jump up^ “UN official calls for talks with taliban leaders”. sify.com. Retrieved 2010-08-27.
- Jump up^ Farmer, Ben (2010-01-25). “UN: lift sanctions on Taliban to build peace in Afghanistan”. The Daily Telegraph(London). Retrieved 2010-04-09.
- Jump up^ “UN Reduce Taliban names on terror list”. United Press International. 2010-01-25. Retrieved 2010-08-27.
- Jump up^ “Asia News”. english.aljazeera.net. 2010-01-26. Retrieved 2010-08-27.
- Taliban in Oxford Islamic Studies Online
- Taliban’s website (English)
- Taliban on Twitter
- How Do I Get in Touch With a Terrorist Slate. October 2009
- The Taliban’s Secret Photos
- Future Opioids: Afghanistan, Opium and the Taliban
- The National Security Archive – The September 11th Sourcebooks Volume VII: The Taliban File September 2003
- The Taliban Diaries by Shaukat Qadir, Daily Times, 2009-06-20
- Taliban collected news and commentary at Al Jazeera English
- Taliban Conflict collected news and commentary at BBC News
- Taliban collected news and commentary at The Guardian
- Taliban collected news and commentary at The New York Times
- Works by or about Taliban in libraries (WorldCat catalog)
- Return Of The Taliban from PBS Frontline, October 2006
- Held by The Taliban: A Reporting Trip Becomes a Kidnapping from The New York Times, 2008–2009
- Military Raids, Backing of Corrupt Government Undermining Stated US Goals in Afghanistan – video report by Democracy Now!